California Baptist

25-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.5%California Baptist

64.5%Utah Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -6.0

PROJECTED TOTAL145.1

MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -182

Utah Valley

25-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCalifornia Baptist 70

Projected Total145.1

Projected ScoreUtah Valley 76

Team Comparison

California BaptistMetricUtah Valley

58.3MMH Power Index59.1

106.5Offensive Efficiency113.4

99.0Defensive Efficiency97.3

7.5Net Efficiency16.1

1.8Strength of Schedule-3.3

11.0Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

68.2Tempo70.6

48.8%Effective FG%56.0%

17.9%Turnover Rate19.9%

37.0%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

37.0%Free Throw Rate37.3%

5.1Average Margin11.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–58.3), offensive efficiency (113.4–106.5), defensive efficiency (97.3–99.0), net efficiency (16.1–7.5).

California Baptist COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–-3.3), recent form (11.0–6.8), ball security (17.9–19.9).

Final

California Baptist

66—73

Utah Valley

Utah Valley by 7 • 70.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

California BaptistTEAM STATUtah Valley

23-45FG30-56

51.0%FG%54.0%

3-123PT4-14

25.0%3PT%29.0%

17-20FT9-20

85.0%FT%45.0%

36Rebounds21

7Offensive Rebounds3

12Assists22

23Turnovers8

3Steals14

2Blocks6

21Fouls18

Player Box Score

California Baptist

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dominique Daniels Jr.	G	36	5-13	1-4	6-6	3	1	0	1	17
Martel Williams	G	35	4-5	1-2	3-3	3	3	0	0	12
Jonathan Griman	F	26	6-10	0-0	0-1	7	1	0	0	12
Bradey Henige	F	21	4-5	0-0	0-0	5	0	2	1	8
Jayden Jackson	G	27	3-8	1-5	0-0	0	3	0	0	7
Thomas Ndong	F	20	1-3	0-0	2-2	8	0	1	0	4
Jordan Muller	G	20	0-0	0-0	3-4	1	4	0	0	3
Devon Malcolm	F	12	0-1	0-1	3-4	6	0	0	0	3
Miles Daniels	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Utah Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jackson Holcombe	G	30	10-17	1-3	4-9	3	5	4	1	25
Trevan Leonhardt	G	34	6-7	0-1	2-4	3	8	2	3	14
Isaac Hawkins	F	19	4-6	1-1	0-0	1	0	1	2	9
Tyler Hendricks	G	26	2-5	1-2	1-2	4	2	1	0	6
Hayden Welling	F	16	3-9	0-3	0-0	4	2	2	0	6
Noah Taitz	G	26	2-5	0-2	1-2	0	1	1	0	5
Braden Housley	G	23	2-5	1-2	0-2	4	3	1	0	5
Isaac Davis	F	14	1-2	0-0	1-1	1	0	2	0	3
Sherman Weatherspoon IV	G	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.5Possessions70.5

93.6Offensive Efficiency103.5

103.5Defensive Efficiency93.6

-9.9Net Efficiency9.9

54.4%Effective FG%57.1%

60.6%True Shooting %55.7%

32.6%Turnover Rate11.3%

44.4%Free Throw Rate35.7%

26.7%3-Point Rate25.0%

0.52Assist / Turnover2.75

Game Summary

Utah Valley won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 70.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.