Nicholls

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

25.4%Nicholls

74.6%Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M-Corpus Christi -8.6

PROJECTED TOTAL144.1

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M-Corpus Christi -294

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNicholls 68

Projected Total144.1

Projected ScoreTexas A&M-Corpus Christi 76

Team Comparison

NichollsMetricTexas A&M-Corpus Christi

43.6MMH Power Index48.7

105.3Offensive Efficiency105.9

109.0Defensive Efficiency98.9

-3.7Net Efficiency7.0

-0.4Strength of Schedule-5.9

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4

68.7Tempo68.4

51.0%Effective FG%51.6%

17.3%Turnover Rate19.3%

28.5%Offensive Rebound %33.3%

35.3%Free Throw Rate39.9%

-2.5Average Margin4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M-Corpus Christi holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.7–43.6), offensive efficiency (105.9–105.3), defensive efficiency (98.9–109.0), net efficiency (7.0–-3.7).

Nicholls COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-5.9), ball security (17.3–19.3).

Final

Nicholls

76—71

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

Nicholls by 5 • 63.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NichollsTEAM STATTexas A&M-Corpus Christi

25-50FG26-50

50.0%FG%52.0%

11-233PT9-18

48.0%3PT%50.0%

15-17FT10-13

88.0%FT%77.0%

24Rebounds26

7Offensive Rebounds8

17Assists14

12Turnovers15

12Steals7

—Blocks2

13Fouls20

Player Box Score

Nicholls

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jalik Dunkley	G	35	5-9	2-4	4-6	5	1	1	16
Christian Winborne	G	31	4-5	4-5	1-1	1	0	6	13
Jaylen Searles	G	35	5-9	2-6	0-0	7	3	0	12
Sincere Malone	F	24	3-5	0-0	6-6	5	2	1	12
Trae English	G	37	2-10	1-3	4-4	0	8	3	9
Zee Hamoda	G	12	3-7	2-4	0-0	2	1	0	8
Grant Sanders	F	17	3-4	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	6
Nick Krass	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0
Kevin Pazmino	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nick Shogbonyo	G	34	5-11	4-8	2-2	0	3	0	0	16
Sheldon Williams	F	32	6-10	0-1	1-1	7	0	1	0	13
Mason Gibson	G	24	4-5	2-2	2-2	4	2	0	0	12
Franck Yetna	F	19	3-6	1-1	2-2	2	1	2	0	9
Kam Parker	G	26	3-6	2-4	0-0	1	2	0	0	8
Cenker Evran	F	19	3-4	0-0	2-2	6	2	2	1	8
Leo Torbor	G	33	2-6	0-2	1-4	2	4	2	0	5
Jaden Haire	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Kobi Pearson	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Daniel Michelini-Jackson	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.2Possessions63.2

120.3Offensive Efficiency112.3

112.3Defensive Efficiency120.3

7.9Net Efficiency-7.9

61.0%Effective FG%61.0%

65.4%True Shooting %63.2%

19.0%Turnover Rate23.7%

34.0%Free Throw Rate26.0%

46.0%3-Point Rate36.0%

1.42Assist / Turnover0.93

Game Summary

Nicholls won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 63.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.