Utah logo

Utah

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.1%Utah
87.9%Washington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWashington -13.5
PROJECTED TOTAL154.5
MODEL MONEYLINEWashington -726
Washington logo

Washington

16-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUtah 71
Projected Total154.5
Projected ScoreWashington 84

Team Comparison

43.9MMH Power Index57.1
108.8Offensive Efficiency112.2
115.8Defensive Efficiency107.1
-7.0Net Efficiency5.1
5.1Strength of Schedule4.2
-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency0.7
68.3Tempo68.7
52.3%Effective FG%51.4%
16.7%Turnover Rate15.3%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %34.2%
32.2%Free Throw Rate30.9%
-4.8Average Margin3.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Washington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWashington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–43.9), offensive efficiency (112.2–108.8), defensive efficiency (107.1–115.8), net efficiency (5.1–-7.0).
Utah COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.1–4.2), shooting efficiency (52.3–51.4), free throw rate (32.2–30.9).
Final
Utah logo
Utah
65—74
Washington logo
Washington
Washington by 9 • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UtahTEAM STATWashington
25-64FG27-53
39.0%FG%51.0%
7-243PT3-15
29.0%3PT%20.0%
8-14FT17-20
57.0%FT%85.0%
36Rebounds32
14Offensive Rebounds4
9Assists13
12Turnovers10
7Steals4
3Blocks9
16Fouls10

Player Box Score

Utah
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Terrence BrownG328-190-45-734400021
Keanu DawesF326-113-82-490000017
Don McHenryG313-122-40-11010008
Kendyl SandersF192-72-30-06020006
Seydou TraoreF292-80-40-03201004
Obomate AbbeyG172-30-10-04200004
James OkonkwoF261-30-01-26101003
Ibrahima TraoreF61-10-00-00000002
Josh HayesF80-00-00-00001000
Washington
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zoom DialloG349-142-44-437100024
Desmond ClaudeG338-140-25-713000021
Hannes SteinbachF376-110-28-9110110020
Quimari PetersonG362-41-30-02011005
Franck KepnangC322-50-00-010206004
JJ MandaquitG170-00-00-02111000
Bryson TuckerF70-40-30-00000000
Nikola DzepinaF40-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6
94.8Offensive Efficiency107.9
107.9Defensive Efficiency94.8
-13.1Net Efficiency13.1
44.5%Effective FG%53.8%
46.0%True Shooting %59.2%
17.5%Turnover Rate14.6%
21.9%Free Throw Rate37.7%
37.5%3-Point Rate28.3%
0.75Assist / Turnover1.30
Game Summary
Washington won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.