Centenary (LA)

0-1

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

2.4%Centenary (LA)

97.6%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -36.1

PROJECTED TOTAL144.8

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -4067

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCentenary (LA) 54

Projected Total144.8

Projected ScoreGrambling 90

Team Comparison

Centenary (LA)MetricGrambling

12.7MMH Power Index41.4

78.3Offensive Efficiency100.7

121.5Defensive Efficiency100.4

-43.2Net Efficiency0.3

0.3Strength of Schedule-5.7

-43.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

74.0Tempo69.9

41.1%Effective FG%49.2%

23.0%Turnover Rate20.9%

13.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

26.8%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-32.0Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–12.7), offensive efficiency (100.7–78.3), defensive efficiency (100.4–121.5), net efficiency (0.3–-43.2).

Centenary (LA) COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.3–-5.7).

Final

Centenary (LA)

58—90

Grambling

Grambling by 32 • 74.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Centenary (LA)TEAM STATGrambling

20-56FG33-67

36.0%FG%49.0%

6-243PT7-25

25.0%3PT%28.0%

12-15FT17-21

80.0%FT%81.0%

28Rebounds46

5Offensive Rebounds14

8Assists13

17Turnovers10

4Steals11

2Blocks1

15Fouls17

Player Box Score

Centenary (LA)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Quentin Beverly	G	29	5-14	0-5	5-5	2	2	0	0	15
Dontarius Coleman	F	20	4-10	3-5	0-0	0	0	0	0	11
Craig Collier	G	20	2-6	1-3	4-4	3	1	0	0	9
Jaden Braden	G	33	4-12	0-3	0-2	2	2	2	0	8
Bryce Evans	C	28	3-8	2-5	0-0	7	1	1	2	8
C.J. Scott	G	13	1-1	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	4
Nicholas Addison	G	29	1-2	0-0	0-0	5	2	0	0	2
Ashton Savoie	G	5	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Kane Broussard	G	23	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jimel Lane	F	29	8-13	0-3	2-2	6	1	2	0	18
Mekhi Fitts	F	24	6-9	1-1	1-3	7	0	0	1	14
Rickey Ballard	F	13	4-9	4-8	0-0	1	0	2	0	12
Devyn Franklin	G	29	4-7	0-2	3-5	11	1	3	0	11
P.J. Edwards	G	23	2-6	0-3	4-4	4	1	1	0	8
Richard Amaefule	F	21	3-7	0-1	2-2	3	1	0	0	8
Jamil Muttilib	G	18	2-6	1-4	1-1	3	2	3	0	6
Antonio Munoz	F	13	2-4	0-1	2-2	2	2	0	0	6
Chancellor Perkins	G	20	1-5	1-2	2-2	5	4	0	0	5
Roderick Coffee III	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

74.1Possessions74.1

78.3Offensive Efficiency121.5

121.5Defensive Efficiency78.3

-43.2Net Efficiency43.2

41.1%Effective FG%54.5%

45.9%True Shooting %58.5%

22.6%Turnover Rate13.7%

26.8%Free Throw Rate31.3%

42.9%3-Point Rate37.3%

0.47Assist / Turnover1.30

Game Summary

Grambling won by 32 points. The game played at approximately 74.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.