Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.2%Pittsburgh
89.8%Miami
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami -15.1
PROJECTED TOTAL148.9
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -880
Miami logo

Miami

26-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePittsburgh 67
Projected Total148.9
Projected ScoreMiami 82

Team Comparison

50.5MMH Power Index65.5
108.4Offensive Efficiency117.8
110.4Defensive Efficiency103.0
-2.0Net Efficiency14.8
5.5Strength of Schedule3.6
-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency3.6
65.0Tempo69.2
51.4%Effective FG%55.5%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.2%
33.1%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
31.2%Free Throw Rate37.9%
-1.3Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–50.5), offensive efficiency (117.8–108.4), defensive efficiency (103.0–110.4), net efficiency (14.8–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–3.6).
Final
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
69—76
Miami logo
Miami
Miami by 7 • 66.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATMiami
27-60FG26-58
45.0%FG%45.0%
6-253PT4-22
24.0%3PT%18.0%
9-17FT20-26
53.0%FT%77.0%
28Rebounds43
8Offensive Rebounds15
13Assists6
7Turnovers10
6Steals5
1Blocks2
17Fouls13

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron CorhenF398-120-01-482100017
Barry Dunning Jr.G386-132-72-230210016
Damarco MinorG335-102-62-224100014
Roman SiulepaF244-81-41-141000010
Brandin CummingsG173-61-40-32200007
Omari WitherspoonG211-50-13-34220005
Nojus IndrusaitisG220-60-30-22100000
Kieran MullenC60-00-00-01100000
Miami
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Malik ReneauF288-132-510-1081000028
Tre DonaldsonG366-141-46-1043100019
Tru WashingtonG334-91-62-250000011
Shelton HendersonF354-100-32-481100010
Ernest Udeh Jr.C303-40-00-011030006
Dante AllenG141-40-10-03000002
Timotej MalovecF110-20-20-01001000
Salih AltuntasF100-10-00-01001000
Noam DovratG30-10-10-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

66.3Possessions66.3
104.1Offensive Efficiency114.6
114.6Defensive Efficiency104.1
-10.6Net Efficiency10.6
50.0%Effective FG%48.3%
50.7%True Shooting %54.0%
10.4%Turnover Rate15.3%
28.3%Free Throw Rate44.8%
41.7%3-Point Rate37.9%
1.86Assist / Turnover0.60
Game Summary
Miami won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 66.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.