New Hampshire

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.5%New Hampshire

98.5%Nebraska

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -26.7

PROJECTED TOTAL143.9

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -6567

Nebraska

28-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 59

Projected Total143.9

Projected ScoreNebraska 85

Team Comparison

New HampshireMetricNebraska

34MMH Power Index67

99.6Offensive Efficiency114.4

107.5Defensive Efficiency98.3

-7.9Net Efficiency16.1

-3.4Strength of Schedule6.1

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency6.8

69.4Tempo67.3

47.6%Effective FG%55.6%

16.1%Turnover Rate14.4%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

29.4%Free Throw Rate26.9%

-5.5Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–34.0), offensive efficiency (114.4–99.6), defensive efficiency (98.3–107.5), net efficiency (16.1–-7.9).

New Hampshire COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (26.7–26.3), free throw rate (29.4–26.9).

Final

New Hampshire

55—86

Nebraska

Nebraska by 31 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New HampshireTEAM STATNebraska

18-56FG27-59

32.0%FG%46.0%

8-323PT5-23

25.0%3PT%22.0%

11-17FT27-35

65.0%FT%77.0%

33Rebounds44

12Offensive Rebounds16

9Assists17

16Turnovers10

8Steals8

1Blocks4

24Fouls13

Player Box Score

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jack Graham	G	28	6-12	3-8	2-2	1	0	2	0	17
R.J. Kennedy	G	24	4-11	3-7	0-0	2	2	0	0	11
Comeh Emuobor	G	19	3-6	0-0	2-7	5	1	0	0	8
KiJan Robinson	G	22	1-7	0-6	4-4	2	5	0	0	6
Tyler Bike	G	22	2-4	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	5
John Squire	F	21	1-3	0-1	2-2	4	0	0	0	4
Davide Poser	F	22	1-4	1-4	0-0	1	0	3	0	3
Belal El Shakery	F	18	0-6	0-2	1-2	6	1	0	0	1
Giannos Xanthopoulos	C	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	1	0
Jon O'Neill	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Myles Blackley	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Nick Sanford	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Dylan Saunders	F	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Pryce Sandfort	F	28	7-15	3-8	2-5	7	1	2	0	19
Braden Frager	F	23	4-6	0-2	7-8	3	1	0	0	15
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	22	4-7	1-2	5-5	4	2	2	1	14
Rienk Mast	F	24	3-11	0-4	4-4	7	5	1	0	10
Sam Hoiberg	G	27	3-6	0-2	2-2	10	1	3	0	8
Ugnius Jarusevicius	F	11	3-3	1-1	0-1	2	0	0	2	7
Jamarques Lawrence	G	21	1-6	0-2	3-4	1	3	0	0	5
Jared Garcia	F	15	1-4	0-2	3-4	5	1	0	0	5
Cale Jacobsen	G	22	1-1	0-0	1-2	0	2	0	1	3
Leo Curtis	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Kendall Blue	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Justin Bolis	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9

79.8Offensive Efficiency124.8

124.8Defensive Efficiency79.8

-45.0Net Efficiency45.0

39.3%Effective FG%50.0%

42.9%True Shooting %56.9%

23.5%Turnover Rate14.4%

30.4%Free Throw Rate59.3%

57.1%3-Point Rate39.0%

0.56Assist / Turnover1.70

Game Summary

Nebraska won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.