
Fordham
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.1%Fordham
82.9%Dayton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDayton -9.5
PROJECTED TOTAL138.7
MODEL MONEYLINEDayton -485

Dayton
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFordham 65
Projected Total138.7
Projected ScoreDayton 74
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index59.9
105.9Offensive Efficiency108.5
99.3Defensive Efficiency101.5
6.6Net Efficiency7.0
-2.4Strength of Schedule5.7
-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
65.9Tempo68.3
50.0%Effective FG%52.0%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.9%
34.5%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
26.9%Free Throw Rate47.6%
4.4Average Margin4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Dayton HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDayton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.3), offensive efficiency (108.5–105.9), net efficiency (7.0–6.6), strength of schedule (5.7–-2.4).
Fordham COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.3–101.5), offensive rebounding (34.5–26.7).