Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

58.6%Clemson

41.4%Syracuse

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -1.3

PROJECTED TOTAL142.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -142

Syracuse

15-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 72

Projected Total142.6

Projected ScoreSyracuse 71

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricSyracuse

59.9MMH Power Index52.2

112.6Offensive Efficiency109.2

101.4Defensive Efficiency106.6

11.2Net Efficiency2.6

4.6Strength of Schedule5.6

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1

63.6Tempo69.0

53.0%Effective FG%52.9%

14.0%Turnover Rate15.6%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %29.0%

38.1%Free Throw Rate36.2%

7.2Average Margin1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–52.2), offensive efficiency (112.6–109.2), defensive efficiency (101.4–106.6), net efficiency (11.2–2.6).

Syracuse COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.6–4.6), offensive rebounding (29.0–27.0).

Final

Clemson

64—61

Syracuse

Clemson by 3 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATSyracuse

27-56FG18-45

48.0%FG%40.0%

4-163PT5-15

25.0%3PT%33.0%

6-12FT20-24

50.0%FT%83.0%

31Rebounds30

7Offensive Rebounds5

9Assists8

12Turnovers15

10Steals3

2Blocks6

18Fouls14

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
RJ Godfrey	F	29	7-9	0-1	0-1	4	2	1	1	14
Dillon Hunter	G	21	4-5	2-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	10
Jestin Porter	G	29	4-8	1-3	0-0	1	1	1	0	9
Ace Buckner	G	19	3-10	0-2	2-3	1	0	3	0	8
Carter Welling	F	27	2-9	0-2	3-5	5	2	2	0	7
Jake Wahlin	F	24	3-4	0-0	0-1	5	1	0	1	6
Nick Davidson	F	21	2-5	0-2	1-2	4	1	1	0	5
Butta Johnson	G	24	1-4	1-3	0-0	2	1	2	0	3
Dallas Thomas	F	2	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Chase Thompson	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Syracuse

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Donnie Freeman	F	28	5-11	2-5	6-6	9	0	0	1	18
Naithan George	G	31	2-9	1-3	5-6	6	6	1	0	10
Tyler Betsey	F	16	2-3	1-2	3-3	3	0	0	0	8
Kiyan Anthony	G	15	2-4	0-1	3-4	0	0	1	1	7
Nate Kingz	G	28	2-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
J.J. Starling	G	34	2-7	0-2	0-0	2	2	1	2	4
William Kyle III	F	25	1-4	0-0	2-4	4	0	0	2	4
Ibrahim Souare	F	12	1-1	0-0	1-1	1	0	0	0	3
Sadiq White Jr.	F	11	1-3	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

96.1Offensive Efficiency91.6

91.6Defensive Efficiency96.1

4.5Net Efficiency-4.5

51.8%Effective FG%45.6%

51.9%True Shooting %54.1%

18.0%Turnover Rate22.6%

21.4%Free Throw Rate53.3%

28.6%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.75Assist / Turnover0.53

Game Summary

Clemson won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.