Stony Brook

17-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.2%Stony Brook

78.8%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -9.0

PROJECTED TOTAL154.2

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -372

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStony Brook 73

Projected Total154.2

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 82

Team Comparison

Stony BrookMetricWilliam & Mary

46.6MMH Power Index53.8

105.9Offensive Efficiency112.5

105.0Defensive Efficiency105.2

0.9Net Efficiency7.3

-0.7Strength of Schedule-1.5

-3.8Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

67.7Tempo73.9

51.0%Effective FG%55.3%

16.6%Turnover Rate16.4%

28.5%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

28.9%Free Throw Rate45.3%

0.6Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–46.6), offensive efficiency (112.5–105.9), net efficiency (7.3–0.9), recent form (3.5–-3.8).

Stony Brook COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.0–105.2), strength of schedule (-0.7–-1.5), offensive rebounding (28.5–26.7).

Final

Stony Brook

57—76

William & Mary

William & Mary by 19 • 64.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Stony BrookTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

20-63FG25-51

32.0%FG%49.0%

9-383PT10-26

24.0%3PT%38.0%

8-9FT16-20

89.0%FT%80.0%

36Rebounds36

15Offensive Rebounds8

11Assists19

13Turnovers12

7Steals7

2Blocks5

22Fouls14

Player Box Score

Stony Brook

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Erik Pratt	G	33	6-17	1-7	6-6	2	2	0	0	19
Rob Brown III	G	31	5-12	5-10	0-1	4	3	2	0	15
Richard Goods	F	29	3-7	1-3	0-0	14	3	0	0	7
Quin Gorman	F	20	2-3	2-3	0-0	4	1	1	0	6
Ethan Simmon	G	26	2-8	0-5	0-0	1	0	1	1	4
Jonah Butler	G	20	1-6	0-4	2-2	1	2	3	1	4
Andrej Shoshkikj	G	17	1-3	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Tomas Valentiny	F	14	0-6	0-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Toby Onyekonwu	G	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Oleg Kojenets	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	30	8-10	3-4	3-3	7	2	0	0	22
Kyle Pulliam	G	27	5-7	2-3	5-5	6	1	2	0	17
Reese Miller	G	24	5-10	0-5	3-3	5	3	0	0	13
Cade Haskins	F	15	2-4	2-3	0-0	3	0	0	1	6
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	15	2-4	2-2	0-0	2	1	1	1	6
Jhei-R Jones	G	16	1-2	1-2	2-2	2	1	1	0	5
Chase Lowe	G	22	1-4	0-0	1-1	5	6	1	1	3
Kilian Brockhoff	F	22	1-8	0-6	0-1	0	5	2	1	2
Jo'el Emanuel	F	22	0-0	0-0	1-3	1	0	0	1	1
Finn Lally	F	7	0-2	0-1	1-2	3	0	0	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

64.9Possessions64.9

87.8Offensive Efficiency117.1

117.1Defensive Efficiency87.8

-29.3Net Efficiency29.3

38.9%Effective FG%58.8%

42.4%True Shooting %62.8%

19.9%Turnover Rate18.6%

14.3%Free Throw Rate39.2%

60.3%3-Point Rate51.0%

0.85Assist / Turnover1.58

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 64.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.