Mercer logo

Mercer

19-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.1%Mercer
61.9%Furman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -3.6
PROJECTED TOTAL155.3
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -162
Furman logo

Furman

22-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMercer 76
Projected Total155.3
Projected ScoreFurman 79

Team Comparison

54.1MMH Power Index53.9
116.6Offensive Efficiency113.3
106.5Defensive Efficiency105.1
10.1Net Efficiency8.2
-4.4Strength of Schedule-1.8
1.2Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6
70.9Tempo67.4
53.8%Effective FG%55.4%
14.7%Turnover Rate17.7%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
38.9%Free Throw Rate32.6%
7.2Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Mercer HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercer holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–53.9), offensive efficiency (116.6–113.3), net efficiency (10.1–8.2), ball security (14.7–17.7).
Furman COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.1–106.5), strength of schedule (-1.8–-4.4), recent form (4.6–1.2).
Final
Mercer logo
Mercer
72—74
Furman logo
Furman
Furman by 2 • 67.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MercerTEAM STATFurman
29-70FG26-59
41.0%FG%44.0%
7-203PT9-23
35.0%3PT%39.0%
7-9FT13-22
78.0%FT%59.0%
37Rebounds41
14Offensive Rebounds13
9Assists16
7Turnovers11
8Steals3
8Blocks1
14Fouls9

Player Box Score

Mercer
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Baraka OkojieG327-162-56-623100022
Zaire WilliamsG295-143-60-120000013
Brady ShouldersG334-71-20-09250009
Armani MightyC364-110-00-013305008
Connor ServenF204-80-20-03013008
Kyle Cuffe Jr.G103-61-20-02000007
Quinton Perkins IIG272-80-30-00110004
Tristan GrossG130-00-01-24000001
Furman
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Alex WilkinsG327-153-43-417000020
Asa ThomasG366-114-93-552110019
Tom HouseG324-81-54-641000013
Ben Vander WalF345-90-01-372000011
Charles JohnstonF333-81-42-212220009
Owen RitgerF61-40-00-02100002
Eddrin BronsonG170-00-00-02000000
Abijah FranklinG100-40-10-22100000

Advanced Game Stats

67.4Possessions67.4
106.8Offensive Efficiency109.8
109.8Defensive Efficiency106.8
-3.0Net Efficiency3.0
46.4%Effective FG%51.7%
48.5%True Shooting %53.3%
10.4%Turnover Rate16.3%
12.9%Free Throw Rate37.3%
28.6%3-Point Rate39.0%
1.29Assist / Turnover1.45
Game Summary
Furman won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 67.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.