
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.0%DePaul
85.0%Villanova
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVillanova -11.4
PROJECTED TOTAL144.7
MODEL MONEYLINEVillanova -567

Villanova
24-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 67
Projected Total144.7
Projected ScoreVillanova 78
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index59.4
103.7Offensive Efficiency114.7
102.7Defensive Efficiency105.9
1.0Net Efficiency8.8
2.0Strength of Schedule4.4
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.1
67.7Tempo67.3
49.9%Effective FG%53.9%
17.8%Turnover Rate15.0%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
36.8%Free Throw Rate31.4%
0.7Average Margin5.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Villanova HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVillanova holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.4–48.4), offensive efficiency (114.7–103.7), net efficiency (8.8–1.0), strength of schedule (4.4–2.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–105.9), free throw rate (36.8–31.4).