DePaul logo

DePaul

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.0%DePaul
85.0%Villanova
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVillanova -11.4
PROJECTED TOTAL144.7
MODEL MONEYLINEVillanova -567
Villanova logo

Villanova

24-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 67
Projected Total144.7
Projected ScoreVillanova 78

Team Comparison

48.4MMH Power Index59.4
103.7Offensive Efficiency114.7
102.7Defensive Efficiency105.9
1.0Net Efficiency8.8
2.0Strength of Schedule4.4
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.1
67.7Tempo67.3
49.9%Effective FG%53.9%
17.8%Turnover Rate15.0%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
36.8%Free Throw Rate31.4%
0.7Average Margin5.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Villanova HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVillanova holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.4–48.4), offensive efficiency (114.7–103.7), net efficiency (8.8–1.0), strength of schedule (4.4–2.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–105.9), free throw rate (36.8–31.4).
Final
DePaul logo
DePaul
66—71
Villanova logo
Villanova
Villanova by 5 • 66.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DePaulTEAM STATVillanova
27-60FG20-58
45.0%FG%34.0%
5-193PT10-23
26.0%3PT%43.0%
7-12FT21-31
58.0%FT%68.0%
43Rebounds39
12Offensive Rebounds15
13Assists9
14Turnovers8
2Steals9
7Blocks3
25Fouls14

Player Box Score

DePaul
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
CJ GunnG306-121-32-472010015
Layden BlockerG305-101-22-453110013
RJ SmithG274-83-60-032000011
NJ BensonF265-80-00-041000010
Brandon MaclinG324-90-21-27511009
Kruz McClureG201-60-32-23000004
Fabián FloresC142-20-00-08001004
Kaleb BanksF190-40-30-04002000
Théo Pierre-JustinF20-10-00-00001000
Villanova
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Bryce LindsayG357-175-100-130100019
Tyler PerkinsG335-124-65-573210019
Duke BrennanF363-50-03-712311009
Acaden LewisG273-90-03-51230009
Devin AskewG252-81-24-42100009
Matt HodgeF320-70-56-96011006
Malachi PalmerG80-00-00-00010000
Braden PierceC40-00-00-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.7Possessions66.7
99.0Offensive Efficiency106.4
106.4Defensive Efficiency99.0
-7.5Net Efficiency7.5
49.2%Effective FG%43.1%
50.2%True Shooting %48.8%
20.7%Turnover Rate12.2%
20.0%Free Throw Rate53.4%
31.7%3-Point Rate39.7%
0.93Assist / Turnover1.13
Game Summary
Villanova won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 66.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.