Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

63.1%Clemson

36.9%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -3.0

PROJECTED TOTAL138.5

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -171

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 71

Projected Total138.5

Projected ScorePittsburgh 68

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricPittsburgh

59.9MMH Power Index50.5

112.6Offensive Efficiency108.4

101.4Defensive Efficiency110.4

11.2Net Efficiency-2.0

4.6Strength of Schedule5.5

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

63.6Tempo65.0

53.0%Effective FG%51.4%

14.0%Turnover Rate17.3%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

38.1%Free Throw Rate31.2%

7.2Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–50.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–108.4), defensive efficiency (101.4–110.4), net efficiency (11.2–-2.0).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–4.6), offensive rebounding (33.1–27.0).

Final

Clemson

73—68

Pittsburgh

Clemson by 5 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATPittsburgh

24-45FG23-52

53.0%FG%44.0%

7-213PT6-17

33.0%3PT%35.0%

18-25FT16-22

72.0%FT%73.0%

28Rebounds27

4Offensive Rebounds6

11Assists9

14Turnovers11

5Steals10

2Blocks—

21Fouls21

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jestin Porter	G	28	8-12	3-6	2-2	2	0	1	0	21
RJ Godfrey	F	28	5-7	0-0	4-7	3	1	0	0	14
Nick Davidson	F	19	5-7	1-3	3-4	3	2	0	0	14
Butta Johnson	G	27	3-5	3-5	1-2	3	3	0	0	10
Carter Welling	F	28	2-5	0-2	4-5	10	0	1	2	8
Dillon Hunter	G	33	1-6	0-4	2-3	5	4	1	0	4
Ace Buckner	G	14	0-1	0-0	2-2	0	1	2	0	2
Jake Wahlin	F	17	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Chase Thompson	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Dallas Thomas	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Damarco Minor	G	36	5-10	3-6	4-5	3	1	3	17
Omari Witherspoon	G	25	6-10	1-3	1-1	3	2	0	14
Roman Siulepa	F	39	4-8	1-2	3-6	7	1	1	12
Barry Dunning Jr.	G	35	3-7	0-3	4-4	6	0	1	10
Cameron Corhen	F	34	4-8	1-1	1-2	4	1	0	10
Brandin Cummings	G	15	1-5	0-1	3-4	1	2	2	5
Nojus Indrusaitis	G	14	0-4	0-1	0-0	0	2	3	0
Kieran Mullen	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

108.6Offensive Efficiency101.2

101.2Defensive Efficiency108.6

7.4Net Efficiency-7.4

61.1%Effective FG%50.0%

64.2%True Shooting %54.4%

20.9%Turnover Rate16.3%

55.6%Free Throw Rate42.3%

46.7%3-Point Rate32.7%

0.79Assist / Turnover0.82

Game Summary

Clemson won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.