
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.6%Colgate
30.4%Army
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -4.0
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -229

Army
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 78
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreArmy 74
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index36.8
111.7Offensive Efficiency104.8
109.0Defensive Efficiency112.1
2.7Net Efficiency-7.3
-2.0Strength of Schedule-3.3
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6
68.4Tempo68.9
54.5%Effective FG%49.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.3%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %31.0%
30.0%Free Throw Rate26.5%
1.8Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–36.8), offensive efficiency (111.7–104.8), defensive efficiency (109.0–112.1), net efficiency (2.7–-7.3).
Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.0–26.9).