Colgate logo

Colgate

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.6%Colgate
30.4%Army
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -4.0
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -229
Army logo

Army

11-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 78
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreArmy 74

Team Comparison

48.8MMH Power Index36.8
111.7Offensive Efficiency104.8
109.0Defensive Efficiency112.1
2.7Net Efficiency-7.3
-2.0Strength of Schedule-3.3
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6
68.4Tempo68.9
54.5%Effective FG%49.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.3%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %31.0%
30.0%Free Throw Rate26.5%
1.8Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Colgate HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–36.8), offensive efficiency (111.7–104.8), defensive efficiency (109.0–112.1), net efficiency (2.7–-7.3).
Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.0–26.9).
Final
Colgate logo
Colgate
76—69
Army logo
Army
Colgate by 7 • 61.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ColgateTEAM STATArmy
26-58FG23-55
45.0%FG%42.0%
10-273PT12-31
37.0%3PT%39.0%
14-16FT11-20
88.0%FT%55.0%
33Rebounds34
11Offensive Rebounds12
17Assists18
7Turnovers8
5Steals3
6Blocks2
16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Colgate
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kyle CarlesimoG377-134-100-031100018
Ben TweedyG316-122-54-533100018
Sam WrightF267-142-52-341000018
Brady CumminsG241-41-36-61100009
Andrew AlekseyenkoF322-90-32-211710006
Ethan BrownF161-11-10-02202003
Cooper WrightF211-30-00-04222002
Ayomi OdetoyinboF131-20-00-03002002
Army
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ryan CurryG367-136-94-547000024
Tate LaczkowskiF285-71-10-082020011
Jaxson BellG282-91-54-78120009
Kevin McCarthyG263-61-40-04300007
Jackson FurmanG252-62-61-20310007
Joshua EliF122-41-21-45000006
Jacen HollowayF272-60-31-22200005
Jorn EversonF180-40-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

61.1Possessions61.1
124.4Offensive Efficiency112.9
112.9Defensive Efficiency124.4
11.5Net Efficiency-11.5
53.4%Effective FG%52.7%
57.9%True Shooting %53.5%
11.4%Turnover Rate13.2%
27.6%Free Throw Rate36.4%
46.6%3-Point Rate56.4%
2.43Assist / Turnover2.25
Game Summary
Colgate won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 61.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.