Baylor logo

Baylor

16-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.5%Baylor
64.5%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.5
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -182
TCU logo

TCU

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBaylor 76
Projected Total156.5
Projected ScoreTCU 81

Team Comparison

BaylorMetricTCU
58.9MMH Power Index59.7
116.7Offensive Efficiency110.2
109.5Defensive Efficiency102.7
7.2Net Efficiency7.5
4.0Strength of Schedule4.6
-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.7Tempo70.2
54.4%Effective FG%50.5%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.3%
37.5%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
34.8%Free Throw Rate38.3%
5.1Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

TCU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–58.9), defensive efficiency (102.7–109.5), net efficiency (7.5–7.2), strength of schedule (4.6–4.0).
Baylor COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.7–110.2), shooting efficiency (54.4–50.5), offensive rebounding (37.5–33.6).
Final
Baylor logo
Baylor
63—69
TCU logo
TCU
TCU by 6 • 64.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BaylorTEAM STATTCU
22-59FG23-60
37.0%FG%38.0%
5-213PT8-20
24.0%3PT%40.0%
14-18FT15-23
78.0%FT%65.0%
34Rebounds43
13Offensive Rebounds19
14Assists16
11Turnovers11
8Steals6
8Blocks10
20Fouls16

Player Box Score

Baylor
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron CarrG366-121-54-531210017
Dan Skillings Jr.G314-111-44-441200013
Tounde YessoufouG324-122-70-051320010
Obi AgbimG301-81-43-33500006
Michael RatajG222-80-11-14201005
James NnajiC162-30-01-24100005
Isaac Williams IVG152-40-00-21112004
Caden PowellC181-10-01-14202003
TCU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Micah RobinsonF313-61-36-8103010013
Xavier EdmondsF194-61-13-541100012
David PunchF303-100-05-782140011
Liutauras LeleviciusG214-73-50-021000011
Jayden PierreG333-102-50-03422008
Brock HardingG373-111-30-15520007
Jace PoseyG193-80-11-26002007
Tanner ToolsonG100-20-20-01001000

Advanced Game Stats

64.3Possessions64.3
98.0Offensive Efficiency107.3
107.3Defensive Efficiency98.0
-9.3Net Efficiency9.3
41.5%Effective FG%45.0%
46.6%True Shooting %48.6%
16.8%Turnover Rate17.5%
30.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
35.6%3-Point Rate33.3%
1.27Assist / Turnover1.45
Game Summary
TCU won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 64.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.