
Baylor
16-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.5%Baylor
64.5%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.5
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -182

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBaylor 76
Projected Total156.5
Projected ScoreTCU 81
Team Comparison
58.9MMH Power Index59.7
116.7Offensive Efficiency110.2
109.5Defensive Efficiency102.7
7.2Net Efficiency7.5
4.0Strength of Schedule4.6
-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.7Tempo70.2
54.4%Effective FG%50.5%
16.4%Turnover Rate15.3%
37.5%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
34.8%Free Throw Rate38.3%
5.1Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
TCU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–58.9), defensive efficiency (102.7–109.5), net efficiency (7.5–7.2), strength of schedule (4.6–4.0).
Baylor COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.7–110.2), shooting efficiency (54.4–50.5), offensive rebounding (37.5–33.6).