
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
71.4%Hofstra
28.6%Drexel
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL138.1
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -250

Drexel
17-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 71
Projected Total138.1
Projected ScoreDrexel 67
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index46.5
114.0Offensive Efficiency103.6
100.9Defensive Efficiency102.4
13.1Net Efficiency1.2
-2.9Strength of Schedule-0.4
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
66.2Tempo65.7
52.2%Effective FG%51.3%
16.1%Turnover Rate19.1%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
32.0%Free Throw Rate32.3%
8.7Average Margin0.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY71.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–46.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.6), defensive efficiency (100.9–102.4), net efficiency (13.1–1.2).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-2.9), free throw rate (32.3–32.0).