Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

85.8%Vanderbilt

14.2%South Carolina

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -10.5

PROJECTED TOTAL159.5

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -604

South Carolina

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 85

Projected Total159.5

Projected ScoreSouth Carolina 74

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricSouth Carolina

68.9MMH Power Index48.2

120.9Offensive Efficiency109.0

105.7Defensive Efficiency111.2

15.2Net Efficiency-2.2

7.4Strength of Schedule5.2

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.4

70.9Tempo68.8

55.3%Effective FG%50.4%

13.5%Turnover Rate14.5%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %27.5%

39.3%Free Throw Rate37.1%

10.8Average Margin-1.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–48.2), offensive efficiency (120.9–109.0), defensive efficiency (105.7–111.2), net efficiency (15.2–-2.2).

Final

Vanderbilt

83—71

South Carolina

Vanderbilt by 12 • 65.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATSouth Carolina

29-57FG25-58

51.0%FG%43.0%

10-233PT7-28

43.0%3PT%25.0%

15-18FT14-18

83.0%FT%78.0%

37Rebounds25

8Offensive Rebounds5

17Assists15

7Turnovers4

2Steals4

3Blocks—

15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	37	4-9	1-2	10-10	4	14	0	0	19
AK Okereke	F	30	7-13	3-6	0-0	6	1	1	1	17
Tyler Nickel	F	28	6-10	4-7	0-1	3	2	0	0	16
Devin McGlockton	F	33	7-13	1-5	0-0	3	0	0	0	15
Jalen Washington	C	20	3-5	0-0	4-5	8	0	1	1	10
Tyler Harris	F	20	1-5	1-2	0-0	6	0	0	1	3
Chandler Bing	G	19	1-2	0-1	1-2	3	0	0	0	3
Mike James	G	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Miles Keeffe	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

South Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Elijah Strong	F	20	6-12	2-6	3-3	4	2	1	17
Myles Stute	G	34	5-10	3-7	1-2	6	0	2	14
Mike Sharavjamts	G	32	5-10	1-3	2-2	3	3	0	13
Meechie Johnson	G	32	2-9	1-5	4-6	2	6	1	9
Eli Ellis	G	26	4-9	0-3	1-1	2	0	0	9
Kobe Knox	G	27	2-6	0-3	2-2	0	3	0	6
EJ Walker	F	3	1-1	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	3
Hayden Assemian	F	16	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0
Jordan Butler	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0
Grant Polk	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.1Possessions65.1

127.5Offensive Efficiency109.1

109.1Defensive Efficiency127.5

18.4Net Efficiency-18.4

59.6%Effective FG%49.1%

63.3%True Shooting %53.3%

10.8%Turnover Rate6.1%

31.6%Free Throw Rate31.0%

40.4%3-Point Rate48.3%

2.43Assist / Turnover3.75

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 65.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.