
Bellarmine
13-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.0%Bellarmine
78.0%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -8.8
PROJECTED TOTAL170.6
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -355

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBellarmine 81
Projected Total170.6
Projected ScoreQueens University 90
Team Comparison
44.9MMH Power Index51.7
119.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
122.1Defensive Efficiency117.0
-2.5Net Efficiency1.4
-2.8Strength of Schedule0.1
0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
66.9Tempo71.4
60.0%Effective FG%56.6%
15.3%Turnover Rate14.8%
22.7%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
35.3%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-1.7Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–44.9), defensive efficiency (117.0–122.1), net efficiency (1.4–-2.5), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.8).
Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (119.6–118.4), shooting efficiency (60.0–56.6).