LSU

15-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.2%LSU

71.8%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -6.9

PROJECTED TOTAL161.4

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -255

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLSU 77

Projected Total161.4

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 84

Team Comparison

LSUMetricTexas A&M

54.2MMH Power Index58

115.5Offensive Efficiency116.1

111.3Defensive Efficiency108.4

4.2Net Efficiency7.7

4.5Strength of Schedule4.8

-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

70.5Tempo69.1

53.4%Effective FG%53.5%

15.6%Turnover Rate14.8%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

41.9%Free Throw Rate37.5%

2.9Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–54.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–115.5), defensive efficiency (108.4–111.3), net efficiency (7.7–4.2).

LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–31.7), free throw rate (41.9–37.5).

Final

LSU

72—75

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 3 • 72.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LSUTEAM STATTexas A&M

25-54FG26-62

46.0%FG%42.0%

6-193PT8-28

32.0%3PT%29.0%

16-20FT15-21

80.0%FT%71.0%

30Rebounds38

7Offensive Rebounds15

15Assists13

16Turnovers15

12Steals8

4Blocks2

18Fouls15

Player Box Score

LSU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mike Nwoko	F	26	7-10	0-0	7-10	5	1	0	0	21
Max Mackinnon	G	38	7-18	4-9	2-2	5	5	2	0	20
Rashad King	G	17	3-6	2-4	2-2	2	0	1	0	10
Robert Miller III	F	14	4-4	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	3	8
Pablo Tamba	F	40	2-4	0-1	2-2	11	2	5	0	6
Jalen Reece	G	36	2-7	0-2	0-0	1	7	1	0	4
Marquel Sutton	F	29	0-4	0-2	3-4	5	0	3	1	3
Mazi Mosley	G	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	32	4-10	0-3	7-9	11	1	0	0	15
Rubén Dominguez	G	31	4-11	4-9	1-2	3	2	0	0	13
Ali Dibba	G	17	5-7	2-2	0-0	3	1	1	0	12
Pop Isaacs	G	23	4-9	1-4	2-3	2	4	1	0	11
Marcus Hill	G	21	3-5	0-1	1-1	6	2	2	0	7
Rylan Griffen	G	20	1-6	1-4	4-6	1	0	3	0	7
Jacari Lane	G	25	2-7	0-4	0-0	5	1	0	0	4
Zach Clemence	F	12	1-5	0-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	2
Federiko Federiko	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jamie Vinson	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2	2
Josh Holloway	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.3Possessions72.3

99.6Offensive Efficiency103.7

103.7Defensive Efficiency99.6

-4.1Net Efficiency4.1

51.9%Effective FG%48.4%

56.7%True Shooting %52.1%

22.1%Turnover Rate20.8%

37.0%Free Throw Rate33.9%

35.2%3-Point Rate45.2%

0.94Assist / Turnover0.87

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 72.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.