
Florida A&M
14-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.0%Florida A&M
74.0%Bethune-Cookman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBethune-Cookman -7.4
PROJECTED TOTAL149.9
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -285

Bethune-Cookman
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 71
Projected Total149.9
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 79
Team Comparison
39.4MMH Power Index44.2
98.7Offensive Efficiency104.7
105.6Defensive Efficiency106.9
-6.9Net Efficiency-2.2
-3.2Strength of Schedule-3.3
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency4.0
70.6Tempo72.0
49.2%Effective FG%51.9%
21.6%Turnover Rate19.2%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
38.0%Free Throw Rate41.9%
-4.8Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–39.4), offensive efficiency (104.7–98.7), net efficiency (-2.2–-6.9), shooting efficiency (51.9–49.2).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.6–106.9), strength of schedule (-3.2–-3.3), recent form (4.5–4.0).