
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.9%Longwood
95.1%High Point
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHigh Point -20.0
PROJECTED TOTAL159.8
MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -1941

High Point
31-5MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 70
Projected Total159.8
Projected ScoreHigh Point 90
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index69
108.1Offensive Efficiency123.8
103.0Defensive Efficiency98.3
5.1Net Efficiency25.5
-6.4Strength of Schedule-5.8
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency16.5
71.9Tempo72.4
51.4%Effective FG%56.6%
19.3%Turnover Rate12.8%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
42.0%Free Throw Rate42.4%
3.6Average Margin18.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
High Point HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–47.0), offensive efficiency (123.8–108.1), defensive efficiency (98.3–103.0), net efficiency (25.5–5.1).
Longwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.4–33.2).