
Manhattan
12-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
10.8%Manhattan
89.2%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -14.0
PROJECTED TOTAL144.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -826

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreManhattan 65
Projected Total144.3
Projected ScoreMerrimack 79
Team Comparison
39.3MMH Power Index53.7
107.1Offensive Efficiency106.4
114.2Defensive Efficiency103.2
-7.1Net Efficiency3.2
-3.6Strength of Schedule0.7
-3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
69.1Tempo64.4
48.5%Effective FG%49.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate14.8%
29.8%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
34.8%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-4.9Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY89.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–39.3), defensive efficiency (103.2–114.2), net efficiency (3.2–-7.1), strength of schedule (0.7–-3.6).
Manhattan COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.1–106.4), offensive rebounding (29.8–24.7).