Florida Atlantic

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.5%Florida Atlantic

42.5%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida Atlantic -1.9

PROJECTED TOTAL152.5

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida Atlantic -135

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 77

Projected Total152.5

Projected ScoreTulane 75

Team Comparison

Florida AtlanticMetricTulane

51.6MMH Power Index44.3

110.5Offensive Efficiency105.3

104.4Defensive Efficiency109.9

6.1Net Efficiency-4.6

-0.9Strength of Schedule2.7

-2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.2Tempo68.7

52.5%Effective FG%49.6%

17.3%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.9%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

33.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

4.3Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida Atlantic HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida Atlantic holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.4–109.9), net efficiency (6.1–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.9), ball security (15.6–17.3), free throw rate (44.8–33.9).

Final

Florida Atlantic

66—69

Tulane

Tulane by 3 • 69.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida AtlanticTEAM STATTulane

26-58FG24-60

45.0%FG%40.0%

5-233PT9-25

22.0%3PT%36.0%

9-15FT12-15

60.0%FT%80.0%

43Rebounds28

14Offensive Rebounds8

10Assists12

18Turnovers11

5Steals12

5Blocks7

17Fouls12

Player Box Score

Florida Atlantic

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Isaiah Elohim	G	33	6-10	0-2	1-2	9	1	1	0	13
Kanaan Carlyle	G	35	4-10	2-4	0-0	7	4	2	0	10
Xander Pintelon	F	24	4-7	2-5	0-0	4	0	0	0	10
Devin Vanterpool	G	27	1-8	1-5	6-8	4	2	0	3	9
Josiah Parker	G	22	4-12	0-3	1-2	5	0	0	0	9
Niccolo Moretti	G	21	2-3	0-1	1-2	1	1	1	0	5
Devin Williams	F	27	2-2	0-0	0-1	7	2	0	1	4
Maxim Logue	F	7	2-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	1	1	4
Max Langenfeld	G	4	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	2

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	37	6-14	2-8	6-8	3	3	2	0	20
Asher Woods	G	32	6-12	2-3	2-2	4	1	3	0	16
Scotty Middleton	F	33	3-8	3-7	0-0	7	0	2	0	9
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	33	3-9	1-4	2-2	3	1	1	0	9
Tyler Ringgold	F	25	2-5	1-1	0-0	2	4	2	4	5
Percy Daniels	C	16	2-2	0-0	1-1	3	1	1	1	5
Josiah Moore	G	13	2-7	0-1	1-2	3	1	0	1	5
KJ Greene	G	11	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	1	1	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.6Possessions69.6

94.8Offensive Efficiency99.1

99.1Defensive Efficiency94.8

-4.3Net Efficiency4.3

49.1%Effective FG%47.5%

50.7%True Shooting %51.4%

26.0%Turnover Rate15.7%

25.9%Free Throw Rate25.0%

39.7%3-Point Rate41.7%

0.56Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

Tulane won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 69.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.