Washington logo

Washington

16-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
34.7%Washington
65.3%Indiana
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIndiana -5.3
PROJECTED TOTAL152.7
MODEL MONEYLINEIndiana -188
Indiana logo

Indiana

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWashington 74
Projected Total152.7
Projected ScoreIndiana 79

Team Comparison

57.1MMH Power Index58.2
112.2Offensive Efficiency116.0
107.1Defensive Efficiency107.1
5.1Net Efficiency8.9
4.2Strength of Schedule5.2
0.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.7
68.7Tempo67.4
51.4%Effective FG%56.0%
15.3%Turnover Rate15.1%
34.2%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
30.9%Free Throw Rate35.8%
3.5Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Indiana HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIndiana holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.2–57.1), offensive efficiency (116.0–112.2), net efficiency (8.9–5.1), strength of schedule (5.2–4.2).
Washington COUNTERS WITHrecent form (0.7–-7.7), offensive rebounding (34.2–26.7).
Final
Washington logo
Washington
80—90
Indiana logo
Indiana
Indiana by 10 • 63.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WashingtonTEAM STATIndiana
26-57FG31-60
46.0%FG%52.0%
6-213PT12-28
29.0%3PT%43.0%
22-25FT16-20
88.0%FT%80.0%
29Rebounds33
8Offensive Rebounds11
10Assists16
4Turnovers4
1Steals1
3Blocks1
18Fouls19

Player Box Score

Washington
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Hannes SteinbachF356-90-28-9101000020
Desmond ClaudeG325-152-66-610000018
Zoom DialloG346-120-24-647000016
Quimari PetersonG264-103-82-210000013
Bryson TuckerF284-61-12-240000011
Franck KepnangC311-10-00-06013002
JJ MandaquitG140-30-20-02200000
Courtland MuldrewG00-10-00-00000000
Indiana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Lamar WilkersonG396-173-107-843100022
Tayton ConerwayG226-74-44-432000020
Conor EnrightG324-92-52-339000012
Trent SisleyF154-62-30-140000010
Reed BaileyF233-70-02-33100008
Nick DornG223-41-21-12000008
Tucker DeVriesF313-70-40-04000006
Sam AlexisF162-30-00-06101004

Advanced Game Stats

63.7Possessions63.7
125.6Offensive Efficiency141.3
141.3Defensive Efficiency125.6
-15.7Net Efficiency15.7
50.9%Effective FG%61.7%
58.1%True Shooting %64.7%
6.2%Turnover Rate6.4%
43.9%Free Throw Rate33.3%
36.8%3-Point Rate46.7%
2.50Assist / Turnover4.00
Game Summary
Indiana won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 63.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.