William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

37.5%William & Mary

62.5%Charleston

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCharleston -3.4

PROJECTED TOTAL158.0

MODEL MONEYLINECharleston -167

Charleston

21-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 77

Projected Total158.0

Projected ScoreCharleston 81

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricCharleston

53.8MMH Power Index53.8

112.5Offensive Efficiency109.2

105.2Defensive Efficiency106.2

7.3Net Efficiency3.0

-1.5Strength of Schedule1.9

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.9

73.9Tempo69.1

55.3%Effective FG%50.6%

16.4%Turnover Rate15.4%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %29.6%

45.3%Free Throw Rate42.1%

5.4Average Margin2.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.5–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.2–106.2), net efficiency (7.3–3.0), shooting efficiency (55.3–50.6).

Charleston COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–-1.5), recent form (3.9–3.5), ball security (15.4–16.4).

Final

William & Mary

79—88

Charleston

Charleston by 9 • 82.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATCharleston

25-77FG27-58

32.0%FG%47.0%

9-363PT11-29

25.0%3PT%38.0%

20-25FT23-29

80.0%FT%79.0%

39Rebounds47

13Offensive Rebounds8

17Assists19

6Turnovers19

14Steals3

3Blocks5

20Fouls18

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	32	7-19	3-10	3-3	3	2	3	2	20
Kilian Brockhoff	F	21	6-12	3-7	1-1	3	2	3	0	16
Chase Lowe	G	22	3-7	0-1	8-8	11	5	1	0	14
Kyle Pulliam	G	25	2-8	1-3	4-5	7	0	1	1	9
Jo'el Emanuel	F	20	2-4	1-3	2-4	1	1	2	0	7
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	19	3-4	0-1	1-2	2	1	1	0	7
Reese Miller	G	26	1-10	1-6	1-2	2	3	1	0	4
Jhei-R Jones	G	10	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Cade Haskins	F	17	0-4	0-3	0-0	3	1	1	0	0
Finn Lally	F	8	0-6	0-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	0

Charleston

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Colby Duggan	F	28	6-12	2-7	3-3	4	4	0	0	17
Martin Kalu	G	28	5-9	4-6	3-4	5	0	1	0	17
Jlynn Counter	G	33	4-9	2-3	6-9	6	6	0	0	16
Chris Davis Jr.	G	12	3-6	1-3	4-5	2	0	0	0	11
Connor Hickman	G	27	2-7	1-6	4-4	4	3	0	0	9
Christian Reeves	C	14	2-2	0-0	1-2	10	0	0	4	5
Jaxon Prunty	G	12	2-5	1-2	0-0	1	2	2	0	5
Chol Machot	C	26	2-4	0-1	0-0	10	1	0	1	4
Chadlyn Traylor	G	20	1-4	0-1	2-2	1	3	0	0	4

Advanced Game Stats

82.4Possessions82.4

95.9Offensive Efficiency106.8

106.8Defensive Efficiency95.9

-10.9Net Efficiency10.9

38.3%Effective FG%56.0%

44.4%True Shooting %61.3%

7.3%Turnover Rate23.0%

32.5%Free Throw Rate50.0%

46.8%3-Point Rate50.0%

2.83Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Charleston won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 82.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.