Texas Southern logo

Texas Southern

12-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.0%Texas Southern
64.0%Grambling
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrambling -5.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.4
MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -178
Grambling logo

Grambling

14-19
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas Southern 70
Projected Total144.4
Projected ScoreGrambling 75

Team Comparison

40.8MMH Power Index41.4
104.2Offensive Efficiency100.7
106.7Defensive Efficiency100.4
-2.5Net Efficiency0.3
-6.3Strength of Schedule-5.7
3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4
69.8Tempo69.9
50.3%Effective FG%49.2%
18.4%Turnover Rate20.9%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
39.3%Free Throw Rate42.2%
-1.8Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–40.8), defensive efficiency (100.4–106.7), net efficiency (0.3–-2.5), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.3).
Texas Southern COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (104.2–100.7), recent form (3.5–-0.4), shooting efficiency (50.3–49.2).
Final
Texas Southern logo
Texas Southern
67—84
Grambling logo
Grambling
Grambling by 17 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas SouthernTEAM STATGrambling
24-59FG27-55
41.0%FG%49.0%
8-213PT12-28
38.0%3PT%43.0%
11-12FT18-27
92.0%FT%67.0%
25Rebounds33
9Offensive Rebounds12
11Assists9
16Turnovers12
5Steals8
6Blocks2
19Fouls12

Player Box Score

Texas Southern
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zaire HayesG3310-165-70-022110025
Troy HupsteadF204-100-13-360000011
Jaylen WysingerG271-71-44-40210007
Alex AndersonG262-41-12-21000007
Duane PoseyG232-50-01-13220005
Bryce RobertsG162-61-50-02110005
Josh AkpovwaF152-20-01-24102005
Anthony AndrewsF151-50-20-02001002
Ahmed Nedal AbdelrahmanG130-10-00-03100000
Jordan GoreckiC60-10-00-02101000
Zytarious MortleG30-10-00-00101000
Oumar KoureissiF30-10-10-00000000
Grambling
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Roderick Coffee IIIF296-95-84-572200021
Derrius WardG297-94-52-253000020
Devyn FranklinG222-60-16-830000010
Rickey BallardF342-72-72-45230008
Mekhi FittsF143-30-02-31010008
Antonio MunozF243-70-01-36200007
Jamil MuttilibG212-61-40-04022005
Jimel LaneF192-50-11-21000005
Saliou SeyeF70-30-20-00000000
Randarius JonesC10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8
96.0Offensive Efficiency120.3
120.3Defensive Efficiency96.0
-24.4Net Efficiency24.4
47.5%Effective FG%60.0%
51.8%True Shooting %61.9%
22.3%Turnover Rate17.7%
20.3%Free Throw Rate49.1%
35.6%3-Point Rate50.9%
0.69Assist / Turnover0.75
Game Summary
Grambling won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.