Incarnate Word

12-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

14.7%Incarnate Word

85.3%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -11.8

PROJECTED TOTAL147.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -580

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 68

Projected Total147.9

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 80

Team Comparison

Incarnate WordMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

44.6MMH Power Index55.8

112.0Offensive Efficiency112.6

111.2Defensive Efficiency103.1

0.8Net Efficiency9.5

-3.6Strength of Schedule-1.9

-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

66.3Tempo67.4

52.2%Effective FG%55.7%

16.8%Turnover Rate17.9%

34.4%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

34.0%Free Throw Rate29.6%

0.5Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY85.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–112.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–111.2), net efficiency (9.5–0.8).

Incarnate Word COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.9), offensive rebounding (34.4–29.2), free throw rate (34.0–29.6).

Final

Incarnate Word

67—80

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Rio Grande Valley by 13 • 64.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Incarnate WordTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

23-66FG29-61

35.0%FG%48.0%

7-233PT9-32

30.0%3PT%28.0%

14-20FT13-15

70.0%FT%87.0%

37Rebounds43

18Offensive Rebounds14

11Assists23

8Turnovers10

8Steals7

1Blocks5

15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Incarnate Word

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tahj Staveskie	G	38	7-18	4-6	3-4	2	4	1	0	21
Harold Woods	G	35	5-8	1-1	3-5	6	0	0	1	14
Davion Bailey	G	34	4-15	2-10	1-2	1	0	6	0	11
Jordan Pyke	F	35	2-10	0-4	5-7	9	1	1	0	9
Lewis Rowe	C	24	3-9	0-0	0-0	8	4	0	0	6
Esteban Mann	F	17	1-3	0-0	2-2	3	1	0	0	4
Love Bettis	G	7	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Marcus Glover	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jayden Williams	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Amani Drummond	G	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Filip Brankovic	F	34	10-16	3-7	6-7	9	3	2	1	29
Koree Cotton	G	29	8-15	2-7	5-5	5	4	2	3	23
Julien Gomez	G	27	4-6	1-2	1-1	9	5	0	0	10
Jaylen Washington	G	24	4-4	0-0	0-0	3	5	1	0	8
Jalen Ricks	G	18	2-6	2-5	1-2	5	2	1	1	7
Zae Blake	G	17	1-5	1-4	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Marvin McGhee III	G	30	0-6	0-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Always Wright	G	15	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	3	0	0	0
Marshal Destremau	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.8Possessions64.8

103.4Offensive Efficiency123.5

123.5Defensive Efficiency103.4

-20.1Net Efficiency20.1

40.2%Effective FG%54.9%

44.4%True Shooting %58.7%

12.2%Turnover Rate15.6%

30.3%Free Throw Rate24.6%

34.8%3-Point Rate52.5%

1.38Assist / Turnover2.30

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 64.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.