Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

90.3%Alabama A&M

9.7%Mississippi Valley State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -13.9

PROJECTED TOTAL146.9

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -931

Mississippi Valley State

3-30

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 80

Projected Total146.9

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 66

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricMississippi Valley State

42.3MMH Power Index17.7

105.9Offensive Efficiency91.1

106.6Defensive Efficiency117.8

-0.7Net Efficiency-26.7

-6.8Strength of Schedule-4.1

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.3

68.0Tempo70.5

49.7%Effective FG%45.8%

16.8%Turnover Rate21.8%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %26.5%

45.7%Free Throw Rate34.5%

-0.5Average Margin-18.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–17.7), offensive efficiency (105.9–91.1), defensive efficiency (106.6–117.8), net efficiency (-0.7–-26.7).

Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-6.8).

Final

Alabama A&M

71—51

Mississippi Valley State

Alabama A&M by 20 • 70.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATMississippi Valley State

20-50FG17-51

40.0%FG%33.0%

6-193PT5-19

32.0%3PT%26.0%

25-30FT12-18

83.0%FT%67.0%

41Rebounds26

11Offensive Rebounds7

13Assists14

17Turnovers18

11Steals8

2Blocks5

19Fouls20

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kintavious Dozier	G	33	2-10	0-2	10-12	7	3	1	0	14
Koron Davis	G	25	5-12	0-3	4-4	5	0	2	0	14
Jalen Carruth	G	25	4-7	3-6	0-1	5	1	1	0	11
Lou Hutchinson	G	24	3-7	2-5	2-3	2	2	1	1	10
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	21	2-4	1-2	4-4	3	4	2	0	9
PJ Eason	F	24	2-5	0-0	4-4	8	0	3	1	8
James Flippin	F	20	2-4	0-0	1-2	6	1	1	0	5
Gabe Kincy	G	21	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Tajden Davis	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Angok Anyang	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael James	G	38	8-19	1-5	5-6	5	4	0	0	22
Lamont Sams	F	30	3-6	1-2	2-2	8	3	0	4	9
Daniel Mayfield	F	26	3-9	1-3	2-4	3	1	1	1	9
Patrick Punch	G	29	1-7	1-7	0-2	4	1	5	0	3
Delkedric Holmes	G	29	1-5	1-1	0-0	2	3	0	0	3
X'Zaevion Barnett	G	22	0-2	0-1	3-4	4	1	1	0	3
Mussa Mzein	C	14	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	2
Chance Sutton	F	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Tyrone Iroghama	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.4Possessions70.4

100.9Offensive Efficiency72.4

72.4Defensive Efficiency100.9

28.4Net Efficiency-28.4

46.0%Effective FG%38.2%

55.3%True Shooting %42.8%

24.2%Turnover Rate25.5%

60.0%Free Throw Rate35.3%

38.0%3-Point Rate37.3%

0.76Assist / Turnover0.78

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 70.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.