
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.5%Tennessee
58.5%Louisville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -3.8
PROJECTED TOTAL155.2
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -141

Louisville
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 76
Projected Total155.2
Projected ScoreLouisville 80
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index67.1
115.8Offensive Efficiency118.6
102.1Defensive Efficiency102.2
13.7Net Efficiency16.4
7.8Strength of Schedule6.0
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
68.1Tempo71.0
51.6%Effective FG%56.9%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.8%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
38.6%Free Throw Rate34.1%
9.3Average Margin11.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–67.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–102.2), strength of schedule (7.8–6.0), recent form (3.3–1.4).
Louisville COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.6–115.8), net efficiency (16.4–13.7), shooting efficiency (56.9–51.6).