
Florida Atlantic
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
25.0%Florida Atlantic
75.0%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -7.2
PROJECTED TOTAL155.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -300

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 74
Projected Total155.8
Projected ScoreUAB 81
Team Comparison
51.6MMH Power Index56.9
110.5Offensive Efficiency110.5
104.4Defensive Efficiency102.9
6.1Net Efficiency7.6
-0.9Strength of Schedule0.4
-2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
71.2Tempo71.7
52.5%Effective FG%48.8%
17.3%Turnover Rate12.4%
32.9%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
33.9%Free Throw Rate36.9%
4.3Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–51.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–104.4), net efficiency (7.6–6.1), strength of schedule (0.4–-0.9).
Florida Atlantic COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.5–48.8), offensive rebounding (32.9–32.7).