Miami

26-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

59.2%Miami

40.8%Wake Forest

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami -2.3

PROJECTED TOTAL157.4

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -145

Wake Forest

18-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami 80

Projected Total157.4

Projected ScoreWake Forest 78

Team Comparison

MiamiMetricWake Forest

65.5MMH Power Index57.6

117.8Offensive Efficiency112.4

103.0Defensive Efficiency109.7

14.8Net Efficiency2.7

3.6Strength of Schedule7.2

3.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1

69.2Tempo70.2

55.5%Effective FG%52.8%

16.2%Turnover Rate15.5%

37.3%Offensive Rebound %30.0%

37.9%Free Throw Rate36.1%

10.3Average Margin1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–57.6), offensive efficiency (117.8–112.4), defensive efficiency (103.0–109.7), net efficiency (14.8–2.7).

Wake Forest COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.2–3.6), ball security (15.5–16.2).

Final

Miami

81—77

Wake Forest

Miami by 4 • 68.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MiamiTEAM STATWake Forest

27-54FG28-54

50.0%FG%52.0%

4-183PT11-21

22.0%3PT%52.0%

23-30FT10-14

77.0%FT%71.0%

37Rebounds20

13Offensive Rebounds4

15Assists15

13Turnovers12

6Steals10

1Blocks6

19Fouls22

Player Box Score

Miami

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tre Donaldson	G	36	7-10	1-2	6-6	3	6	0	0	21
Malik Reneau	F	29	6-13	1-3	5-7	6	4	2	0	18
Tru Washington	G	31	4-6	0-1	5-7	4	1	0	0	13
Ernest Udeh Jr.	C	24	3-4	0-0	4-4	13	0	2	0	10
Shelton Henderson	F	31	4-7	1-3	0-2	4	0	0	0	9
Dante Allen	G	16	2-5	0-1	3-4	0	1	2	0	7
Timotej Malovec	F	20	1-7	1-7	0-0	3	1	0	0	3
Noam Dovrat	G	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Salih Altuntas	F	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Wake Forest

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Juke Harris	G	36	9-15	4-8	6-10	2	1	3	1	28
Nate Calmese	G	32	8-13	3-4	0-0	2	4	0	1	19
Myles Colvin	G	37	5-8	3-4	0-0	3	3	3	0	13
Sebastian Akins	G	8	2-5	0-2	2-2	0	2	0	0	6
Mekhi Mason	G	20	2-2	1-1	0-0	2	0	1	2	5
Tre'Von Spillers	F	35	1-6	0-0	2-2	8	4	0	2	4
Cooper Schwieger	F	16	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	2
Omaha Biliew	F	16	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.5Possessions68.5

118.2Offensive Efficiency112.4

112.4Defensive Efficiency118.2

5.8Net Efficiency-5.8

53.7%Effective FG%62.0%

59.3%True Shooting %63.5%

19.0%Turnover Rate17.5%

55.6%Free Throw Rate25.9%

33.3%3-Point Rate38.9%

1.15Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Miami won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 68.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.