
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
44.5%SMU
55.5%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL150.5
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -125

Clemson
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 74
Projected Total150.5
Projected ScoreClemson 77
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index59.9
118.2Offensive Efficiency112.6
109.6Defensive Efficiency101.4
8.6Net Efficiency11.2
7.0Strength of Schedule4.6
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
71.1Tempo63.6
55.7%Effective FG%53.0%
15.7%Turnover Rate14.0%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
31.3%Free Throw Rate38.1%
6.1Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–59.9), offensive efficiency (118.2–112.6), strength of schedule (7.0–4.6), recent form (-1.3–-4.7).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–109.6), net efficiency (11.2–8.6), ball security (14.0–15.7).