
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.0%Hofstra
48.0%Towson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTowson -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL138.1
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -108

Towson
19-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 69
Projected Total138.1
Projected ScoreTowson 69
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index54
114.0Offensive Efficiency106.7
100.9Defensive Efficiency101.9
13.1Net Efficiency4.8
-2.9Strength of Schedule0.5
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6
66.2Tempo64.9
52.2%Effective FG%47.9%
16.1%Turnover Rate15.9%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %36.6%
32.0%Free Throw Rate30.5%
8.7Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–54.0), offensive efficiency (114.0–106.7), defensive efficiency (100.9–101.9), net efficiency (13.1–4.8).
Towson COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-2.9), ball security (15.9–16.1), offensive rebounding (36.6–35.0).