Maine logo

Maine

8-24
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.2%Maine
95.8%UMBC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -20.1
PROJECTED TOTAL133.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -2281
UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMaine 57
Projected Total133.2
Projected ScoreUMBC 77

Team Comparison

MaineMetricUMBC
35.6MMH Power Index59.1
95.6Offensive Efficiency113.0
104.6Defensive Efficiency99.0
-9.0Net Efficiency14.0
-1.8Strength of Schedule-5.6
-6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency24.7
65.4Tempo65.5
50.5%Effective FG%54.3%
19.0%Turnover Rate14.3%
19.4%Offensive Rebound %25.2%
38.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-5.9Average Margin9.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–35.6), offensive efficiency (113.0–95.6), defensive efficiency (99.0–104.6), net efficiency (14.0–-9.0).
Maine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-5.6), free throw rate (38.5–34.1).
Final
Maine logo
Maine
62—69
UMBC logo
UMBC
UMBC by 7 • 65.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MaineTEAM STATUMBC
26-59FG24-56
44.0%FG%43.0%
4-183PT4-10
22.0%3PT%40.0%
6-11FT17-23
55.0%FT%74.0%
32Rebounds38
8Offensive Rebounds10
6Assists7
9Turnovers8
4Steals2
4Blocks2
14Fouls8

Player Box Score

Maine
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
TJ BielF3611-182-63-4100030027
Ryan MabreyG344-92-50-040110010
Logan CareyG284-90-10-05210008
Caleb CrawfordG243-60-11-10200007
Ace FlaggF353-70-20-25120006
Amare AllenF180-60-22-43000002
Yanis BambaF111-30-10-00000002
Bashir N'GalangG120-10-00-00100000
Isaac BonillaG20-00-00-00000000
UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jah'Likai KingG364-132-45-761000015
Ace ValentineG344-110-26-833200014
Caden DiggsF236-91-20-060000013
Riley JacobsF244-60-02-270000010
DJ Armstrong Jr.G333-80-13-34100009
Daylon DickersonF72-20-00-12101004
Cougar DowningG61-11-10-00000003
Paul GreeneF90-10-01-22000001
Josh OdunowoF280-50-00-07101000

Advanced Game Stats

65.1Possessions65.1
95.2Offensive Efficiency106.0
106.0Defensive Efficiency95.2
-10.8Net Efficiency10.8
47.5%Effective FG%46.4%
48.3%True Shooting %51.6%
13.8%Turnover Rate12.3%
18.6%Free Throw Rate41.1%
30.5%3-Point Rate17.9%
0.67Assist / Turnover0.88
Game Summary
UMBC won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 65.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.