
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.6%Stonehill
77.4%Central Connecticut
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCentral Connecticut -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL139.5
MODEL MONEYLINECentral Connecticut -342

Central Connecticut
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 66
Projected Total139.5
Projected ScoreCentral Connecticut 74
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index44.4
97.5Offensive Efficiency111.4
100.7Defensive Efficiency107.0
-3.2Net Efficiency4.4
-5.4Strength of Schedule-7.7
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.5
68.1Tempo66.3
48.0%Effective FG%54.0%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.9%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %28.2%
29.2%Free Throw Rate31.3%
-2.2Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Central Connecticut HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCentral Connecticut holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.4–37.9), offensive efficiency (111.4–97.5), net efficiency (4.4–-3.2), recent form (-0.5–-3.4).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–107.0), strength of schedule (-5.4–-7.7), offensive rebounding (28.4–28.2).