
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.7%Queens University
40.3%Jacksonville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -0.5
PROJECTED TOTAL160.9
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -148

Jacksonville
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 81
Projected Total160.9
Projected ScoreJacksonville 80
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index43.6
118.4Offensive Efficiency109.8
117.0Defensive Efficiency110.3
1.4Net Efficiency-0.5
0.1Strength of Schedule-4.8
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.2
71.4Tempo66.6
56.6%Effective FG%51.7%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.9%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
37.6%Free Throw Rate33.9%
0.9Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–43.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–109.8), net efficiency (1.4–-0.5), strength of schedule (0.1–-4.8).
Jacksonville COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.3–117.0), offensive rebounding (33.6–29.6).