
Lipscomb
18-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.2%Lipscomb
40.8%Stetson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLipscomb -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.4
MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -145

Stetson
12-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLipscomb 79
Projected Total154.4
Projected ScoreStetson 76
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index40
111.3Offensive Efficiency107.2
107.6Defensive Efficiency115.9
3.7Net Efficiency-8.7
-2.5Strength of Schedule-1.0
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.9
68.8Tempo68.7
54.8%Effective FG%53.8%
16.0%Turnover Rate18.3%
25.9%Offensive Rebound %28.1%
26.5%Free Throw Rate33.6%
2.5Average Margin-6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–40.0), offensive efficiency (111.3–107.2), defensive efficiency (107.6–115.9), net efficiency (3.7–-8.7).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.0–-2.5), offensive rebounding (28.1–25.9), free throw rate (33.6–26.5).