Yale

23-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

87.3%Yale

12.7%Princeton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADYale -10.9

PROJECTED TOTAL143.9

MODEL MONEYLINEYale -687

Princeton

9-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreYale 77

Projected Total143.9

Projected ScorePrinceton 67

Team Comparison

YaleMetricPrinceton

65.4MMH Power Index43.5

121.4Offensive Efficiency105.1

105.8Defensive Efficiency110.3

15.6Net Efficiency-5.2

1.6Strength of Schedule1.7

8.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2

64.5Tempo65.2

56.8%Effective FG%50.3%

13.9%Turnover Rate16.9%

33.3%Offensive Rebound %27.5%

34.4%Free Throw Rate35.0%

10.1Average Margin-3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–43.5), offensive efficiency (121.4–105.1), defensive efficiency (105.8–110.3), net efficiency (15.6–-5.2).

Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–1.6), free throw rate (35.0–34.4).

Final

Yale

60—76

Princeton

Princeton by 16 • 65.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

YaleTEAM STATPrinceton

23-65FG22-48

35.0%FG%46.0%

5-293PT11-27

17.0%3PT%41.0%

9-15FT21-23

60.0%FT%91.0%

30Rebounds36

13Offensive Rebounds8

6Assists11

8Turnovers12

5Steals7

—Blocks4

21Fouls16

Player Box Score

Yale

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Nick Townsend	F	37	5-12	0-1	3-3	5	1	0	13
Samson Aletan	C	27	5-8	0-0	1-6	8	1	1	11
Trevor Mullin	G	27	3-12	3-9	1-1	1	0	1	10
Jordan Brathwaite	G	25	3-9	1-7	2-2	2	1	2	9
Riley Fox	F	23	3-11	1-8	0-0	1	1	1	7
Casey Simmons	G	25	2-7	0-1	2-3	3	0	0	6
Isaac Celiscar	F	19	2-5	0-2	0-0	3	2	0	4
Devon Arlington	G	13	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0
Jack Sullivan	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Princeton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jackson Hicke	G	36	8-13	3-5	8-10	5	2	0	1	27
Dalen Davis	G	28	5-12	3-5	4-4	3	1	2	0	17
Jack Stanton	G	38	1-5	1-5	7-7	3	0	2	0	10
Malik Abdullahi	F	35	3-4	0-1	2-2	9	4	0	0	8
Landon Clark	G	21	3-7	2-6	0-0	5	1	3	0	8
CJ Happy	F	19	2-6	2-4	0-0	4	0	0	0	6
Jacob Huggins	F	21	0-1	0-1	0-0	5	3	0	3	0
Sebastian Whitfield	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.0Possessions65.0

92.3Offensive Efficiency116.9

116.9Defensive Efficiency92.3

-24.6Net Efficiency24.6

39.2%Effective FG%57.3%

41.6%True Shooting %64.5%

11.9%Turnover Rate19.1%

23.1%Free Throw Rate47.9%

44.6%3-Point Rate56.3%

0.75Assist / Turnover0.92

Game Summary

Princeton won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 65.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.