VMI logo

VMI

5-26
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.7%VMI
96.3%Furman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFurman -21.2
PROJECTED TOTAL148.6
MODEL MONEYLINEFurman -2603
Furman logo

Furman

22-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVMI 64
Projected Total148.6
Projected ScoreFurman 85

Team Comparison

VMIMetricFurman
29.1MMH Power Index53.9
105.1Offensive Efficiency113.3
117.4Defensive Efficiency105.1
-12.3Net Efficiency8.2
-5.4Strength of Schedule-1.8
-21.9Last 10 Net Efficiency4.6
66.2Tempo67.4
48.9%Effective FG%55.4%
14.7%Turnover Rate17.7%
26.4%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
29.9%Free Throw Rate32.6%
-8.2Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Furman HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFurman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (113.3–105.1), defensive efficiency (105.1–117.4), net efficiency (8.2–-12.3).
VMI COUNTERS WITHball security (14.7–17.7).
Final
VMI logo
VMI
48—69
Furman logo
Furman
Furman by 21 • 65.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VMITEAM STATFurman
15-56FG24-56
27.0%FG%43.0%
9-313PT11-33
29.0%3PT%33.0%
9-13FT10-18
69.0%FT%56.0%
32Rebounds48
13Offensive Rebounds18
9Assists14
16Turnovers20
16Steals7
2Blocks5
14Fouls15

Player Box Score

VMI
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
TJ JohnsonF384-123-104-442600015
Walker AndrewsG192-72-54-530000010
Linus HolmstromG322-71-41-24330006
AJ ClarkG263-80-10-02142006
Tan YildizogluG232-72-30-03210006
Mario Tatum Jr.G231-91-40-22000003
Kaden StuckeyF221-30-10-05110002
Cal ListonF150-30-30-03010000
Alexander DaushviliF20-00-00-01000000
Furman
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Alex WilkinsG347-163-110-034300017
Eddrin BronsonG245-114-72-340020016
Ben Vander WalF294-50-03-862100011
Charles JohnstonF301-70-44-515522006
Asa ThomasG122-42-30-01100006
Cole BowserG252-30-10-05200004
Abijah FranklinG161-10-01-21011003
Mason SmithF151-51-40-06000003
Tom HouseG71-41-30-01000003
Owen RitgerF70-00-00-01000000
Thomas TillmanF10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.9Possessions65.9
72.8Offensive Efficiency104.7
104.7Defensive Efficiency72.8
-31.9Net Efficiency31.9
34.8%Effective FG%52.7%
38.6%True Shooting %53.4%
24.5%Turnover Rate30.1%
23.2%Free Throw Rate32.1%
55.4%3-Point Rate58.9%
0.56Assist / Turnover0.70
Game Summary
Furman won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 65.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.