Nebraska logo

Nebraska

28-7
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.6%Nebraska
38.4%Indiana
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNebraska -2.1
PROJECTED TOTAL148.0
MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -160
Indiana logo

Indiana

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNebraska 75
Projected Total148.0
Projected ScoreIndiana 73

Team Comparison

67MMH Power Index58.2
114.4Offensive Efficiency116.0
98.3Defensive Efficiency107.1
16.1Net Efficiency8.9
6.1Strength of Schedule5.2
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.7
67.3Tempo67.4
55.6%Effective FG%56.0%
14.4%Turnover Rate15.1%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %26.7%
26.9%Free Throw Rate35.8%
10.8Average Margin6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–58.2), defensive efficiency (98.3–107.1), net efficiency (16.1–8.9), strength of schedule (6.1–5.2).
Indiana COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.0–114.4), shooting efficiency (56.0–55.6), offensive rebounding (26.7–26.3).
Final
Nebraska logo
Nebraska
83—77
Indiana logo
Indiana
Nebraska by 6 • 66.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NebraskaTEAM STATIndiana
29-60FG26-56
48.0%FG%46.0%
14-343PT11-30
41.0%3PT%37.0%
11-14FT14-17
79.0%FT%82.0%
31Rebounds31
9Offensive Rebounds10
18Assists16
8Turnovers14
9Steals4
—Blocks—
12Fouls15

Player Box Score

Nebraska
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jamarques LawrenceG378-135-86-853300027
Rienk MastF326-141-70-062000013
Pryce SandfortF374-93-61-232100012
Braden FragerF194-91-52-240100011
Berke BuyuktuncelF253-52-20-04400008
Cale JacobsenG202-21-12-22210007
Sam HoibergG252-61-40-03530005
Jared GarciaF50-20-10-00000000
Indiana
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Lamar WilkersonG399-205-119-944000032
Tucker DeVriesF296-133-82-263200017
Reed BaileyF304-50-02-490100010
Nick DornG192-52-50-00100006
Conor EnrightG342-50-20-02200004
Tayton ConerwayG261-40-11-25500003
Trent SisleyF131-31-30-01000003
Sam AlexisF101-10-00-01110002

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9
124.1Offensive Efficiency115.1
115.1Defensive Efficiency124.1
9.0Net Efficiency-9.0
60.0%Effective FG%56.3%
62.3%True Shooting %60.1%
12.2%Turnover Rate20.6%
23.3%Free Throw Rate30.4%
56.7%3-Point Rate53.6%
2.25Assist / Turnover1.14
Game Summary
Nebraska won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.