LSU

15-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.5%LSU

89.5%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -14.4

PROJECTED TOTAL164.8

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -852

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLSU 75

Projected Total164.8

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 90

Team Comparison

LSUMetricVanderbilt

54.2MMH Power Index68.9

115.5Offensive Efficiency120.9

111.3Defensive Efficiency105.7

4.2Net Efficiency15.2

4.5Strength of Schedule7.4

-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

70.5Tempo70.9

53.4%Effective FG%55.3%

15.6%Turnover Rate13.5%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

41.9%Free Throw Rate39.3%

2.9Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–54.2), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.5), defensive efficiency (105.7–111.3), net efficiency (15.2–4.2).

LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–30.8), free throw rate (41.9–39.3).

Final

LSU

73—84

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 11 • 71.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LSUTEAM STATVanderbilt

27-59FG27-63

46.0%FG%43.0%

7-203PT7-30

35.0%3PT%23.0%

12-17FT23-29

71.0%FT%79.0%

35Rebounds36

10Offensive Rebounds12

14Assists13

14Turnovers7

4Steals10

3Blocks6

17Fouls17

Player Box Score

LSU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Mackinnon	G	38	9-16	3-6	6-6	4	4	2	0	27
Marquel Sutton	F	31	5-11	1-3	2-2	6	0	0	1	13
Robert Miller III	F	17	3-3	0-0	3-4	2	1	0	1	9
Jalen Reece	G	32	2-9	2-5	0-0	3	2	1	0	6
Mike Nwoko	F	22	3-5	0-0	0-2	7	1	0	1	6
Pablo Tamba	F	19	3-5	0-0	0-2	4	1	0	0	6
Mazi Mosley	G	27	1-6	1-4	0-0	6	2	0	0	3
Rashad King	G	11	1-3	0-1	1-1	1	3	1	0	3
PJ Carter	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Tanner	G	36	7-18	0-5	6-7	3	3	3	0	20
Tyler Nickel	F	35	6-12	4-10	3-3	10	1	0	2	19
Duke Miles	G	27	4-10	1-5	8-8	1	5	1	0	17
AK Okereke	F	34	5-7	1-2	1-2	1	0	3	0	12
Jalen Washington	C	26	3-5	1-2	4-5	8	1	2	2	11
Devin McGlockton	F	17	2-5	0-2	0-0	9	0	1	2	4
Chandler Bing	G	7	0-2	0-1	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Mike James	G	15	0-4	0-3	0-0	1	3	0	0	0
Tyler Harris	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.4Possessions71.4

102.2Offensive Efficiency117.6

117.6Defensive Efficiency102.2

-15.4Net Efficiency15.4

51.7%Effective FG%48.4%

54.4%True Shooting %54.7%

19.7%Turnover Rate9.8%

28.8%Free Throw Rate46.0%

33.9%3-Point Rate47.6%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.86

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 71.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.