
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.4%Harvard
60.6%Columbia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -4.2
PROJECTED TOTAL142.7
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -154

Columbia
16-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 69
Projected Total142.7
Projected ScoreColumbia 73
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index51.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency112.4
102.9Defensive Efficiency105.2
5.2Net Efficiency7.2
-0.1Strength of Schedule-1.7
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.4
64.8Tempo68.2
53.4%Effective FG%54.4%
17.2%Turnover Rate19.1%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %37.3%
27.9%Free Throw Rate28.8%
3.4Average Margin5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.4–108.1), net efficiency (7.2–5.2), shooting efficiency (54.4–53.4), offensive rebounding (37.3–26.3).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (52.6–51.9), defensive efficiency (102.9–105.2), strength of schedule (-0.1–-1.7).