William & Mary

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.5%William & Mary

42.5%Drexel

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -0.7

PROJECTED TOTAL149.4

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -135

Drexel

17-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 75

Projected Total149.4

Projected ScoreDrexel 74

Team Comparison

William & MaryMetricDrexel

53.8MMH Power Index46.5

112.5Offensive Efficiency103.6

105.2Defensive Efficiency102.4

7.3Net Efficiency1.2

-1.5Strength of Schedule-0.4

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

73.9Tempo65.7

55.3%Effective FG%51.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate19.1%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %30.7%

45.3%Free Throw Rate32.3%

5.4Average Margin0.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–46.5), offensive efficiency (112.5–103.6), net efficiency (7.3–1.2), recent form (3.5–-4.7).

Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–105.2), strength of schedule (-0.4–-1.5), offensive rebounding (30.7–26.7).

Final

William & Mary

58—64

Drexel

Drexel by 6 • 66.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

William & MaryTEAM STATDrexel

22-60FG24-47

37.0%FG%51.0%

5-233PT8-18

22.0%3PT%44.0%

9-12FT8-13

75.0%FT%62.0%

28Rebounds37

10Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists18

13Turnovers19

15Steals8

3Blocks6

15Fouls12

Player Box Score

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	29	3-9	1-4	3-5	6	2	2	1	10
Kyle Pulliam	G	26	4-7	2-4	0-0	2	2	1	0	10
Reese Miller	G	22	3-8	1-5	2-2	2	2	1	0	9
Chase Lowe	G	24	4-11	0-0	0-0	4	2	3	0	8
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	21	3-4	0-0	0-0	1	1	2	1	6
Jo'el Emanuel	F	27	1-5	0-2	2-2	0	3	3	0	4
Jhei-R Jones	G	17	1-4	0-2	2-2	4	1	0	0	4
Kilian Brockhoff	F	15	1-6	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	1	3
Cade Haskins	F	12	1-3	0-2	0-0	3	0	1	0	2
Finn Lally	F	7	1-3	0-1	0-1	0	0	1	0	2

Drexel

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevon Vanderhorst	G	30	6-12	0-2	1-2	1	2	1	0	13
Shane Blakeney	G	28	5-11	3-6	0-0	6	5	0	1	13
Josh Reed	G	26	4-8	1-1	2-2	4	1	2	0	11
Dillon Tingler	G	14	3-5	1-3	2-2	2	2	0	0	9
Victor Panov	F	24	2-3	2-3	0-0	10	2	2	2	6
Garfield Turner	F	17	1-2	0-0	2-4	5	1	0	1	4
Villiam Garcia Adsten	G	25	1-1	0-0	1-2	3	1	3	2	3
Eli Beard	G	22	1-3	1-3	0-1	1	3	0	0	3
Martin de LaPorterie	F	14	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

66.5Possessions66.5

87.2Offensive Efficiency96.2

96.2Defensive Efficiency87.2

-9.0Net Efficiency9.0

40.8%Effective FG%59.6%

44.1%True Shooting %60.2%

18.9%Turnover Rate29.6%

20.0%Free Throw Rate27.7%

38.3%3-Point Rate38.3%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.95

Game Summary

Drexel won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 66.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.