Abilene Christian

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

21.2%Abilene Christian

78.8%UT Arlington

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -9.6

PROJECTED TOTAL139.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -372

UT Arlington

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAbilene Christian 65

Projected Total139.2

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 74

Team Comparison

Abilene ChristianMetricUT Arlington

42.4MMH Power Index49.6

101.1Offensive Efficiency102.7

104.1Defensive Efficiency97.9

-3.0Net Efficiency4.8

-1.4Strength of Schedule-0.8

-5.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9

69.6Tempo68.1

48.9%Effective FG%48.5%

20.6%Turnover Rate20.4%

32.4%Offensive Rebound %36.0%

42.0%Free Throw Rate43.7%

-2.1Average Margin3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–42.4), offensive efficiency (102.7–101.1), defensive efficiency (97.9–104.1), net efficiency (4.8–-3.0).

Abilene Christian COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (48.9–48.5).

Final

Abilene Christian

72—82

UT Arlington

UT Arlington by 10 • 66.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Abilene ChristianTEAM STATUT Arlington

23-45FG26-51

51.0%FG%51.0%

5-123PT5-13

42.0%3PT%38.0%

21-32FT25-29

66.0%FT%86.0%

20Rebounds32

7Offensive Rebounds11

12Assists10

12Turnovers13

9Steals6

5Blocks3

20Fouls23

Player Box Score

Abilene Christian

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bradyn Hubbard	F	30	8-13	3-5	8-9	4	0	3	0	27
Rich Smith	G	37	5-7	0-0	5-10	3	8	3	1	15
Cade Hornecker	F	27	5-9	1-1	0-2	4	2	0	3	11
Zy Wright	G	14	2-3	0-0	2-3	0	0	0	0	6
Yaniel Rivera	G	24	1-5	1-4	1-2	1	1	0	1	4
Joseph Scott	F	11	1-4	0-0	2-2	0	0	2	0	4
Joseph Venzant	G	36	0-2	0-1	3-4	5	0	0	0	3
Cbo Newton	G	15	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	1	1	0	2
Ma'Shy Hill	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Isaac Dye	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Tylan Lewis	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marcell McCreary	G	33	5-8	2-5	8-8	6	2	1	1	20
Bahsil Laster	G	30	4-8	1-4	9-10	3	3	1	0	18
Cash Chavis	G	23	5-10	1-1	4-4	1	2	1	1	15
Raysean Seamster	F	35	5-11	0-0	0-0	5	0	2	1	10
Cameron Jackson	F	19	2-4	0-0	3-4	5	1	0	0	7
Tyran Mason	G	12	2-2	1-1	1-1	3	1	0	0	6
Miles Goodman	F	16	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Jordan Lowery	G	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	G	16	0-4	0-2	0-2	2	1	0	0	0
Amari Reed	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.0Possessions66.0

109.1Offensive Efficiency124.2

124.2Defensive Efficiency109.1

-15.2Net Efficiency15.2

56.7%Effective FG%55.9%

59.8%True Shooting %63.3%

18.4%Turnover Rate19.5%

71.1%Free Throw Rate56.9%

26.7%3-Point Rate25.5%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.77

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 66.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.