Oklahoma

21-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

48.7%Oklahoma

51.3%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -2.3

PROJECTED TOTAL161.7

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -105

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreOklahoma 80

Projected Total161.7

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 82

Team Comparison

OklahomaMetricTexas A&M

62.1MMH Power Index58

119.5Offensive Efficiency116.1

111.6Defensive Efficiency108.4

7.9Net Efficiency7.7

3.2Strength of Schedule4.8

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

69.4Tempo69.1

55.1%Effective FG%53.5%

14.4%Turnover Rate14.8%

32.4%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

36.2%Free Throw Rate37.5%

5.5Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Oklahoma HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOklahoma holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.1–58.0), offensive efficiency (119.5–116.1), net efficiency (7.9–7.7), recent form (12.3–-7.2).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–111.6), strength of schedule (4.8–3.2), free throw rate (37.5–36.2).

Final

Oklahoma

76—83

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 7 • 70.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OklahomaTEAM STATTexas A&M

26-62FG26-62

42.0%FG%42.0%

11-313PT10-33

35.0%3PT%30.0%

13-16FT21-25

81.0%FT%84.0%

43Rebounds32

16Offensive Rebounds12

12Assists12

17Turnovers8

4Steals8

3Blocks5

22Fouls20

Player Box Score

Oklahoma

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nijel Pack	G	31	8-20	6-13	2-2	6	5	0	0	24
Derrion Reid	F	33	6-10	4-5	3-5	11	1	2	0	19
Tae Davis	F	37	5-11	0-1	2-3	10	1	0	0	12
Xzayvier Brown	G	29	3-9	0-4	1-1	3	2	0	0	7
Mohamed Wague	F	17	2-2	0-0	1-1	5	0	1	1	5
Jadon Jones	G	20	1-4	1-4	0-0	0	2	1	1	3
Kuol Atak	F	10	0-2	0-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Kirill Elatontsev	C	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Dayton Forsythe	G	8	0-2	0-1	2-2	0	1	0	0	2
Kai Rogers	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jeff Nwankwo	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	27	5-9	0-1	6-7	12	2	2	2	16
Rylan Griffen	G	28	5-9	3-6	1-2	2	0	0	0	14
Rubén Dominguez	G	25	4-9	4-9	2-2	1	0	0	0	14
Pop Isaacs	G	20	3-9	1-4	6-6	2	3	1	0	13
Marcus Hill	G	28	3-8	1-3	3-3	1	1	1	0	10
Zach Clemence	F	9	2-4	1-3	0-0	4	0	0	1	5
Ali Dibba	G	18	2-7	0-2	0-0	3	0	2	0	4
Josh Holloway	G	9	1-2	0-1	2-3	1	1	1	0	4
Jacari Lane	G	25	1-4	0-3	1-2	1	5	0	0	3
Federiko Federiko	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Jamie Vinson	F	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.3Possessions70.3

108.1Offensive Efficiency118.1

118.1Defensive Efficiency108.1

-10.0Net Efficiency10.0

50.8%Effective FG%50.0%

54.6%True Shooting %56.2%

24.1%Turnover Rate11.4%

25.8%Free Throw Rate40.3%

50.0%3-Point Rate53.2%

0.71Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 70.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.