Loyola Maryland

12-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

51.5%Loyola Maryland

48.5%Bucknell

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBucknell -0.1

PROJECTED TOTAL149.5

MODEL MONEYLINELoyola Maryland -106

Bucknell

10-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 75

Projected Total149.5

Projected ScoreBucknell 75

Team Comparison

Loyola MarylandMetricBucknell

40.8MMH Power Index35.7

108.1Offensive Efficiency99.5

110.7Defensive Efficiency112.8

-2.6Net Efficiency-13.3

-5.0Strength of Schedule2.0

-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5

69.6Tempo67.7

51.2%Effective FG%48.4%

15.7%Turnover Rate19.0%

29.4%Offensive Rebound %26.6%

31.0%Free Throw Rate30.7%

-1.8Average Margin-8.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Loyola Maryland HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLoyola Maryland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (40.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (108.1–99.5), defensive efficiency (110.7–112.8), net efficiency (-2.6–-13.3).

Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-5.0).

Final

Loyola Maryland

67—70

Bucknell

Bucknell by 3 • 68.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Loyola MarylandTEAM STATBucknell

23-60FG26-59

38.0%FG%44.0%

14-373PT6-22

38.0%3PT%27.0%

7-9FT12-16

78.0%FT%75.0%

35Rebounds36

11Offensive Rebounds12

17Assists15

15Turnovers14

10Steals9

2Blocks2

15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Loyola Maryland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacob Theodosiou	G	32	8-17	4-9	0-0	4	4	2	0	20
Braeden Speed	G	33	3-9	1-4	4-5	5	4	2	1	11
Troy Cicero Jr.	G	22	3-11	3-9	0-0	4	1	2	0	9
Emmett Adair	F	25	3-4	1-2	0-0	7	1	1	0	7
Sam Springer	F	18	2-7	2-5	0-0	2	1	0	0	6
Tyson Commander	G	24	1-5	1-2	1-2	4	1	1	0	4
Jonas Sirtautas	F	15	1-2	0-1	2-2	2	2	1	1	4
Jordan Stiemke	G	15	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Sebastien Emenalo	G	11	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Carter Berg-McLean	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	3	0	0	0

Bucknell

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Pat Curtin	G	28	10-17	2-7	3-3	5	1	1	0	25
Amon Dörries	C	38	8-13	1-1	2-3	6	4	2	2	19
Jayden Williams	G	29	2-8	1-5	3-5	0	3	3	0	8
Ruot Bijiek	F	16	2-6	1-2	2-2	5	1	0	0	7
Aleksander Pachucki	G	25	1-3	1-3	1-2	6	1	0	0	4
Achile Spadone	G	36	1-6	0-2	1-1	8	2	1	0	3
Jacob Meachem	G	11	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Patrick O'Brien	F	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Quin Berger	G	10	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	2	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.4Possessions68.4

98.0Offensive Efficiency102.3

102.3Defensive Efficiency98.0

-4.4Net Efficiency4.4

50.0%Effective FG%49.2%

52.1%True Shooting %52.6%

22.0%Turnover Rate20.4%

15.0%Free Throw Rate27.1%

61.7%3-Point Rate37.3%

1.13Assist / Turnover1.07

Game Summary

Bucknell won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 68.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.