
Grambling
14-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.6%Grambling
69.4%Bethune-Cookman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBethune-Cookman -4.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.5
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -227

Bethune-Cookman
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGrambling 71
Projected Total147.5
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 76
Team Comparison
41.4MMH Power Index44.2
100.7Offensive Efficiency104.7
100.4Defensive Efficiency106.9
0.3Net Efficiency-2.2
-5.7Strength of Schedule-3.3
-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.0
69.9Tempo72.0
49.2%Effective FG%51.9%
20.9%Turnover Rate19.2%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
42.2%Free Throw Rate41.9%
0.2Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–41.4), offensive efficiency (104.7–100.7), strength of schedule (-3.3–-5.7), recent form (4.0–-0.4).
Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–106.9), net efficiency (0.3–-2.2), offensive rebounding (30.4–30.3).