Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

65.2%Clemson

34.8%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -3.4

PROJECTED TOTAL143.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -187

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 74

Projected Total143.6

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 70

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricNotre Dame

59.9MMH Power Index49.7

112.6Offensive Efficiency110.3

101.4Defensive Efficiency111.2

11.2Net Efficiency-0.9

4.6Strength of Schedule4.7

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

63.6Tempo68.0

53.0%Effective FG%53.0%

14.0%Turnover Rate17.0%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

38.1%Free Throw Rate34.7%

7.2Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–49.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.3), defensive efficiency (101.4–111.2), net efficiency (11.2–-0.9).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.7–4.6), offensive rebounding (31.4–27.0).

Final

Clemson

76—61

Notre Dame

Clemson by 15 • 64.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATNotre Dame

27-58FG20-47

47.0%FG%43.0%

7-263PT9-21

27.0%3PT%43.0%

15-18FT12-18

83.0%FT%67.0%

31Rebounds29

8Offensive Rebounds6

11Assists7

6Turnovers14

7Steals2

1Blocks3

15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jestin Porter	G	32	9-14	2-6	6-6	0	2	5	0	26
RJ Godfrey	F	32	6-8	0-0	4-6	3	2	1	0	16
Carter Welling	F	27	5-9	1-2	3-4	6	3	0	0	14
Dillon Hunter	G	31	3-5	1-2	0-0	7	3	0	0	7
Jake Wahlin	F	30	1-8	1-7	2-2	6	0	1	0	5
Ace Buckner	G	13	2-7	1-3	0-0	3	1	0	0	5
Nick Davidson	F	13	1-3	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	1	3
Butta Johnson	G	13	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Chase Thompson	F	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Dallas Thomas	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Haralson	F	27	6-11	3-4	3-5	0	0	0	0	18
Logan Imes	G	28	5-9	3-5	0-0	3	2	0	0	13
Carson Towt	F	32	2-2	0-0	5-8	10	2	2	1	9
Cole Certa	G	23	2-5	2-3	2-2	1	0	0	0	8
Brady Koehler	F	20	2-8	0-2	2-3	6	0	0	1	6
Braeden Shrewsberry	G	32	2-7	1-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Kebba Njie	F	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Garrett Sundra	F	13	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	1	0
Ryder Frost	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Mark Zackery IV	G	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Sir Mohammed	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.1Possessions64.1

118.6Offensive Efficiency95.2

95.2Defensive Efficiency118.6

23.4Net Efficiency-23.4

52.6%Effective FG%52.1%

57.1%True Shooting %54.9%

9.3%Turnover Rate22.0%

31.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%

44.8%3-Point Rate44.7%

1.83Assist / Turnover0.50

Game Summary

Clemson won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 64.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.