UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

80.7%UT Rio Grande Valley

19.3%East Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -8.0

PROJECTED TOTAL145.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -418

East Texas A&M

11-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 77

Projected Total145.8

Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 69

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricEast Texas A&M

55.8MMH Power Index38.4

112.6Offensive Efficiency101.2

103.1Defensive Efficiency107.5

9.5Net Efficiency-6.3

-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.5

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.1

67.4Tempo69.3

55.7%Effective FG%50.7%

17.9%Turnover Rate18.7%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

29.6%Free Throw Rate31.9%

6.4Average Margin-4.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–38.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–101.2), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.5), net efficiency (9.5–-6.3).

East Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-1.9), free throw rate (31.9–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

69—77

East Texas A&M

East Texas A&M by 8 • 65.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATEast Texas A&M

25-56FG29-58

45.0%FG%50.0%

10-263PT11-28

38.0%3PT%39.0%

9-13FT8-13

69.0%FT%62.0%

27Rebounds33

9Offensive Rebounds10

14Assists24

12Turnovers12

12Steals10

3Blocks4

16Fouls13

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Filip Brankovic	F	32	6-12	0-3	4-5	7	0	1	1	16
Marvin McGhee III	G	39	5-11	4-9	0-0	3	4	3	0	14
Julien Gomez	G	30	5-8	3-4	0-1	0	1	1	0	13
Jaylen Washington	G	32	5-10	0-0	0-0	4	4	3	0	10
Koree Cotton	G	24	2-6	1-3	5-7	4	1	2	2	10
Always Wright	G	22	1-4	1-3	0-0	4	2	1	0	3
Demarris Winters	G	5	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Kwo Agwa	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Jalen Ricks	G	5	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Zae Blake	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

East Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ronnie Harrison	F	36	8-13	2-3	0-0	7	3	1	1	18
Gianni Hunt	G	34	4-9	3-7	2-2	3	10	1	0	13
Damian Garcia	G	33	4-8	1-3	3-7	4	3	1	1	12
Noah Pagotto	F	32	5-8	0-1	2-2	11	4	2	1	12
Tay Mosher	F	36	3-10	3-9	1-2	2	2	3	0	10
Josh Taylor	F	15	3-5	1-2	0-0	3	2	1	1	7
London Fields	G	8	2-4	1-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	5
Alex McCray	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.7Possessions65.7

105.0Offensive Efficiency117.2

117.2Defensive Efficiency105.0

-12.2Net Efficiency12.2

53.6%Effective FG%59.5%

55.5%True Shooting %60.0%

18.4%Turnover Rate18.1%

23.2%Free Throw Rate22.4%

46.4%3-Point Rate48.3%

1.17Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

East Texas A&M won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 65.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.