Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.5%Vanderbilt

42.5%Texas

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -1.3

PROJECTED TOTAL164.2

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -135

Texas

21-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 83

Projected Total164.2

Projected ScoreTexas 81

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricTexas

68.9MMH Power Index61.6

120.9Offensive Efficiency119.6

105.7Defensive Efficiency110.1

15.2Net Efficiency9.5

7.4Strength of Schedule5.3

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.4

70.9Tempo69.2

55.3%Effective FG%55.1%

13.5%Turnover Rate15.5%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %35.9%

39.3%Free Throw Rate44.3%

10.8Average Margin6.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–61.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–119.6), defensive efficiency (105.7–110.1), net efficiency (15.2–9.5).

Texas COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.9–30.8), free throw rate (44.3–39.3).

Final

Vanderbilt

64—80

Texas

Texas by 16 • 66.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATTexas

22-60FG27-51

37.0%FG%53.0%

9-253PT7-17

36.0%3PT%41.0%

11-15FT19-22

73.0%FT%86.0%

24Rebounds42

10Offensive Rebounds11

13Assists13

10Turnovers15

7Steals6

4Blocks2

18Fouls17

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Duke Miles	G	32	7-16	3-5	4-5	3	4	3	1	21
Tyler Tanner	G	34	5-15	3-7	4-4	3	2	2	0	17
Tyler Nickel	F	30	4-9	2-5	0-0	3	2	1	0	10
Devin McGlockton	F	23	4-10	0-4	1-2	7	1	0	0	9
Tyler Harris	F	18	1-6	1-3	0-0	0	0	0	1	3
Jayden Leverett	C	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Chandler Bing	G	3	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	1	0	0	2
AK Okereke	F	28	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	3	0	1	0
Jalen Washington	C	15	0-2	0-1	0-2	2	0	1	1	0
Mike James	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jaylon Dean-Vines	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Texas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Matas Vokietaitis	C	32	7-9	0-0	8-9	7	0	1	0	22
Tramon Mark	G	31	6-12	4-7	5-6	4	3	0	2	21
Dailyn Swain	G	34	5-8	0-1	4-5	9	7	1	0	14
Jordan Pope	G	36	5-11	2-5	0-0	2	0	1	0	12
Chendall Weaver	G	23	2-5	0-0	2-2	9	1	2	0	6
Camden Heide	F	28	1-3	1-3	0-0	6	1	0	0	3
Lassina Traore	F	8	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Simeon Wilcher	G	8	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.3Possessions66.3

96.5Offensive Efficiency120.7

120.7Defensive Efficiency96.5

-24.1Net Efficiency24.1

44.2%Effective FG%59.8%

47.7%True Shooting %65.1%

14.9%Turnover Rate22.9%

25.0%Free Throw Rate43.1%

41.7%3-Point Rate33.3%

1.30Assist / Turnover0.87

Game Summary

Texas won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 66.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.